The avicennian understanding of the commonness of nature and its influence on John Duns Scotus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/23461780.5144Keywords:
Avicenna, Common Nature, Duns Scotus, Medieval Metaphysics, Medieval Philosophy, Metaphysics.Abstract
The concept of common nature in Duns Scotus is generally recognized for taking inspiration from the same concept of the philosopher Avicenna. While the proposals of the philosophers regarding common nature are similar, the difference between them and the contributions made by Scotus may not be immediately clear. This article examines the profound influence of Avicenna’s proposal on Scotist theory and elucidates Scotus’ contributions and the evolution of the concept of common nature from a Scotist perspective. This study explores the questions: Is Scotus’ theory simply a reflection of Avicenna’s proposal? And what are the contributions that Scotus introduces to the concept of common nature that were previously presented by Avicenna? The article will demonstrate that Scotus adds valuable ideas to the concept of common nature that were not initially present in Avicenna’s proposal, which helps create a clearer distinction between the common and the universal and will eventually serve as the basis for the realist epistemology proposed by Scotus and his views on the understanding of reality and its relationship with knowledge.
Downloads
References
Aristoteles. (1965). De Interpretatione: De interpretatione vel Periermenias. Translatio Boethii (L. Minio-Paluello, Ed.; G. de Moerbeka, Trans.; G. Verbeke, Rev.; L. Minio-Paluello, Ed.; Aristoteles Latinus II 1-2). Desclée De Brouwer.
Avicenna. (1980) Liber De Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina Partes V-X (Avicenna Latinus, S. van Riet (Ed.), Vol. 2). Brill.
Avicenna. (2005). The Metaphysics of The Healing (M. Marmura, Trans.). Brigham Young University Press.
Boethius. (1877). Commentarii in Libri Aristoteles Peri Hermeneias (C. Meiser, Ed.). Teubneri.
Cohen, M., & Reeve, C. D. C. (2021). Aristotle’s Metaphysics. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/aristotle-metaphysics/
De Haan, D. (2020). Necessary Existence and the Doctrine of Being in Avicenna’s Metaphysics of the Healing (Investigating Medieval Philosophy Vol. 15). Brill.
Emilsson, E. (2022). Porphyry. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/porphyry/
Galluzzo, G. (2011). Two Senses of ’Common’. Avicenna’s doctrine of essence and Aquinas’s view on individuation. In D. N. Hasse & A. Bertolacci (Eds.), The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics (Scientia Greco-Arabica Vol. 7, pp. 309-337). De Gruyter.
González-Ayesta, C., & González-Ginocchio, D. (2015). Logic, ontology and the psychology of universals in Duns Scotus. In G. Klima & A. W. Hall (Eds.), Maimonides on God and Duns Scotus on Logic and Metaphysics (Proceedings of the Society of Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, Vol. 12, pp. 101-131). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Janos, D. (2020). Avicenna on the Ontology of Pure Quiddity (Scientia Greco-Arabica, Vol. 26). De Gruyter.
Jaramillo, M. J. (2017). The metaphysical concept of nature by John Duns Scotus and its epistemological implications. Forum. Supplement to Acta Philosophica, 3, 415-432. https://doi.org/10.17421/2498-9746-03-25
King, P. (1992). Duns Scotus on the common nature and the individual differentia. Philosophical Topics, 20(2), 51-76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154129
Klima, G. (2022). The medieval problem of universals. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/universals-medieval/
Kobusch, T. (1987). Sein und Sprache: Historische Grundlegung einer Ontologie der Sprache. Brill.
Libera, A. (1996). La Querelle des Universaux : De Platon à la fin du Moyen Age. Éditions du Seuil.
Marenbon, J. (2021). Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/boethius/
Marmura, M. (1992). Quiddity and universality in Avicenna. In P. Morewedge (Ed.), Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought (Studies in Neoplatonism: Ancient and Modern Vol. 5, pp. 77-88). State University of New York Press.
Owens, J. (1957). Common nature: A point of comparison between Thomistic and Scotistic metaphysics. Medieval Studies, 19, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.MS.2.306612
Pérez-Estévez, A. (2006). Entendimiento y universalidad en Duns Escoto. In Pacheco, M. C. & Meirinhos. J. F. (Eds.), Intellect et imagination dans la Philosophie Médiévale / Intellect and imagination in Medieval Philosophy / Intelecto e imaginaçao na Filosofia Medieval (Actes du XIe Congrès International de Philosophie Médiévale de la Société Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale, S.I.E.P.M., Porto, du 26 au 31 août 2002, Vol. 11, pp. 1507-1521). Brepols.
Pini, G. (2011). Scotus and Avicenna on what it is to be a thing. In D. N. Hasse & A. Bertolacci (Eds.), The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics (Scientia Greco-Arabica Vol. 7, pp. 365-387). De Gruyter.
Porphyry. (1887). Isagoge, (A. Busse, Ed.; Commentaria in Aristotelem Greca Vol. 4/1). De Gruyter.
Regis, E. (1976). Aristotle on universals. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 40(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1976.0042
Scotus, D. (1973). Ordinatio, Liber II, Distinctiones 1-3; (C. Balić et al., Eds.; Opera Omnia, Vol. 7). Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis. https://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Authors/Duns_Scotus/Ordinatio/Ordinatio_II/D3/P1Q1#cite_note-5
Scotus, D. (1997). Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis, Libri VI–IX; (G. Etzkorn et al., Eds.; Opera Philosophica, Vol. 4). The Franciscan Institute.
Studtmann, P. (2021). Aristotle’s categories. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-categories/
Sykes, R. D. (1975). Form in Aristotle: Universal or particular? Philosophy, 50(193), 311-331. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3749857
Wisnovsky, R. (2005). Avicenna and the Avicennian tradition. In P. Adamson & R. Taylor (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy (pp. 92–136). Cambridge University Press.
Wisnovsky, R. (2011). Essence and existence in the eleventh- and twelfth-century Islamic East (Mašriq): A Sketch, in: Hasse, D. N.; Bertolacci, A. (Ed.), The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics (Scientia Greco-Arabica Vol. 7, pp. 27‒50). De Gruyter.
Wisnovsky, R. (2013). Avicenna’s Islamic reception. In P. Adamson (Ed.), Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays (pp. 190–213). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
La revista y los textos individuales que en esta se divulgan están protegidos por las leyes de copyright y por los términos y condiciones de la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Sin Derivar 4.0 Internacional.
