Questioning relationships in the metaverse. The “between” as a space of encounter and meaning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/23461780.4761Keywords:
Bonding, Ethos, Generative communication, Metaverse, Person, Social relationships, UtopiaAbstract
The metaverse as a new promised space of social interaction does not configure, in itself, the possibility of encounter, because it is not the space that propitiates the “between” but the disposition of people, therefore this article directs its gaze to the interior of the human being and focuses on the ethical reflection of being in being, precisely because every tool configures a new Ethos with the subject. First, after problematizing the question of the metaverse, the concept of social relation is developed, to move on, as a second point, to space as a configurator of utopia and how the human being is constructed in what he himself creates. In this way, we arrive at the last point in which it is proposed that the promise of the metaverse does not hold in itself the possibility of being better people, but, as a tool, it depends exclusively on the use that is given to it.
Downloads
References
Ánjel, M. (2016). La significación de lo insignificante: Una provocación de lo que nos rodea y nos hace humanos en la teoría de Martin Buber. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.
Ánjel, M., & Cifuentes Yarce, J. D. (2021). Dialogando sobre el diálogo. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.
Appadurai, A. (2011). Moderinità in Polvere. Raffaello Cortina.
Arendt, H. (1998). La condición humana. Paidós.
Aristóteles. (1988). Política (M. García Valdés, Trad.). Gredos.
Bauman, Z. (2001). La posmodernidad y sus descontentos. Akal.
Bauman, Z. (2010). Mundo consumo: Ética del individuo en la aldea global. Paidós.
Buber, M. (s. f.). The Knowledge of Man (M. Friedman, Trad.). Harper Torchbooks.
Buber, M. (2017). Yo y tú. Herder.
Calvino, I. (2013). Las ciudades continuas 1. En Las ciudades invisibles. Siruela.
Castells, M. (2006). La sociedad Red: Vol. I. Siglo XXI Editores.
Cruz, M. (2015). Hacerse Cargo: Por una responsabilidad fuerte y unas identidades débiles. Gedisa.
Donati, P. (2010). La matrice teologica della società. Rubbettino.
Donati, P. (2013). Sociologia della relazione. Il Mulino.
Donati, P. (1994). Cultura e comunicazione: Un approccio relazionale. Lo Spettacolo, 44(2), 167-181.
Floridi, L. (2022). Metaverse: A Matter of Experience. Philosophy & Technology, 35(3), 73, s13347-022-00568-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00568-6
Giaccardi, C. (2017). Informazione e intrattenimento nella stampa e nei media audiovisivi. En Fabris Adriano & I. Maffeis (Eds.), Di terra e di cielo—Manuale di comunicazione per seminaristi e animatori (pp. 59-70). San Paolo.
Han, B.-C. (2013). La sociedad de la transparencia. Herder.
Han, B.-C. (2014). En el enjambre. Herder.
Han, B.-C. (2017). La expulsión de lo distinto. Herder.
Kant, I. (2008). Fundamentación para una metafísica de las costumbres. Alianza.
Montoya, A. C. (2019). La persona y el enigma de la relación. En Humanismo y cultura ciudadana. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.
Mumford, L. (2021). Historia de las utopías. Pepitas de calabaza.
Ong, W. J. (2006). Oralidad y escritura. Tecnologías de la palabra. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Parménides & Heráclito (1977). Fragmentos. Orbis.
Platón (2013). La República. Alianza.
Plotino (1996). Eneada I. Planeta de Agostini.
Rees, K. (2022, febrero 16). These 8 Tech Giants Have Invested Big in the Metaverse. Make use of. https://www.makeuseof.com/companies-investing-in-metaverse/
Rodríguez Valls, F. (2009). Antropología y utopía. Thémata.
Sloterdijk, P. (2014). Crítica de la razón cínica. Siruela.
Vallejo, I. (2022). Alguien habló de nosotros. Contraseña.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT AND ACCESS TO PUBLICATIONCopyright
The author or authors may have additional rights in their articles as established in their agreement with the publisher. The authors are morally and legally responsible for the content of their articles, as well as respect for copyright. Therefore, these do not compromise Luis Amigó Catholic University or its Editorial Fund in any way.
License
The magazine and the individual texts that are disclosed herein are protected by copyright laws and the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative 4.0 International License. © 2017 Luis Amigó Catholic University.
Permits that go beyond what is covered by this license can be found at http://www.funlam.edu.co/modules/fondoeditorial/
Publication and disclosure
The complete journal and the individual texts are published in PDF and HTML formats in the Open Journal Systems (in the following link: http://www.funlam.edu.co/revistas/index.php/perseitas/index). Likewise, Perseitas has a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for both complete numbers and articles, which facilitates its location on the Internet, a tool that guarantees the preservation of access to the content of the journal in the event that it ceases to be published.
Once the inclusion of the texts in the journal is approved, the advance publication is generated, with the purpose of responding to the needs of validity of the content and the requirements of the authors and the medium. This provisional edition contains the latest version sent by the authors, without the style correction, the translation or the layout being made yet.
Perseitas uses, among other media, social and academic networks to disseminate its content.
