The Will, a link between the supreme good and the inclinations

Authors

  • Victor Hugo Monsalve Villegas Universidad Católica Luis Amigó image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21501/2744838X.4567

Keywords:

Moral philosophy, Will, Categorical imperative, Highest good, Reason

Abstract

In this article, the Kantian concept of Will is investigated, in order to answer the question: how is the supreme good and the inclinations objectively related? For this purpose, it starts from the conceptual conceptions of morality in Kant argued in his works, more precisely from his second Critique. According to Kant, the Will is the desire to obey the laws of reason, that is, the moral laws, without any interference from sensory pathologies. In order to try to find the objective possibility between reason and inclination, I maintain, based on second readings of interpreters of Kant, such as Schnewind, for example, the optimistic position in which man is in full desiderative faculty to subsume his actions to the judgments of reason. The title of this article allows us to visualize how the Will serves as a link between the principles of reason and the empirical objectivity of actions. The concept of Will in
Kant makes it possible to clarify the rational capacities with which human nature has been endowed, which would be as much as to say that, yes, it is possible, once one has critically reflected on the formal structure of morality in Kant, get to obtain acts in the fundamental empirical plane from the reason and not from the pathological inclination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kant, I. (2016). La religión dentro de los límites de la mera razón (3ª edición). Alianza.

Kant, I. (1978). Crítica de la razón pura. Alfaguara. Kant, I. (2010). Fundamentación para una metafísica de las costumbres. Gredos,

S.A.

Kant, I. (2010). Crítica de la razón práctica. Gredos, S.A.

Kant, I. (1999). Crítica del Juicio. Colección Austral. Espesa.

Kant, I. (1995). La metafísica de las costumbres. Rei Andes Ltda.

Kant, I. (2002). Lecciones de ética. Crítica, S.L.

Cassirer, E. (1948). Kant, vida y doctrina. Fondo de Cultura Económica, S.A.

Bilbeny, N. (1994). Kant y el tribunal de la conciencia. Gedisa.

Urdanoz, T. (1991). Historia de la filosofía IV siglo XIX, Kant, idealismo y espiritualismo. Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

Schneewind, J. (2009). La invención de la autonomía. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Bowman, C. (2013). Una deducción del concepto de sumo bien kantiano. Signos Filosóficos, 15(29), 195-222. https://signosfilosoficos.izt.uam.mx/index.php/SF/article/view/510/485

Vorpagel da Silva, L. (2016). Sobre el problema de la libertad en Kant. Anales del Seminario de Historial de la Filosofía, 33(2), 541-559. https://doi.org/10.5209/ASHF.53596

Sobarzo, M. (2009-2010). La inflexión de la voluntad: Kant-Arendt. Revista de Filosofía, (18-19), 73-94. https://ediciones.ucsh.cl/index.php/hirf/article/view/555/503

Villarán, A. (2015). El sumo bien kantiano: el objeto construido de la ley moral. Pensamiento, 71(268), 827-843. https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/6398

Published

2024-04-15

How to Cite

Monsalve Villegas, V. H. (2024). The Will, a link between the supreme good and the inclinations. Ciencia Y Academia, (5). https://doi.org/10.21501/2744838X.4567

Issue

Section

Artículos de reflexión