Editorial. Thinking the Human Sciences: the necessary militancy or the impossible neutrality

Authors

  • Ricardo Andrade Rodríguez Fondo Editorial

Keywords:

Human Sciences

Abstract

For a stronger research in the Social Sciences it is necessary to have two elements into account. The first is the national policies on research. The second is the need for the strengthening of the training and the quality of work that the social scientists make as well as the knowledge that they can produce.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ricardo Andrade Rodríguez, Fondo Editorial

Medellín, Antioquia

References

Blair, E. (18 de julio de 2012). Las Ciencias Sociales. Recuperado de http://www.udea.edu.co/portal/page/portal/BibliotecaInvestigacion/

InformacionGeneral/utilidades/documentos/Jornada-academica-cienciassociales.pdf

Bunge, M. (2003). La ciencia, su método y su filosofía. Buenos Aires: Panamericana.

Foucault, M. (1995). Crítica y Aufklärung [“Qu´est-ce que la critique?”. Revista de Filosofía-ULA, 1-18.

Harvey, D. (2012). Population, Resources, and the ideology of science. Economic Geography, 256-277.

Rossell, S. (2008). La epistemología contemporánea: entre filosofía y psicología. Límite, 53-76.

Published

2013-01-01

How to Cite

Rodríguez, R. A. (2013). Editorial. Thinking the Human Sciences: the necessary militancy or the impossible neutrality. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Sociales, 4(1), 6–10. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucatolicaluisamigo.edu.co/index.php/RCCS/article/view/945