Presentation. The affinity between logic and ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/22161201.2354Keywords:
Scientific Writing, Research, Social Sciences, Ethics, PlagiarismAbstract
The presentation of this issue aims to reflect on the professional, research and publishing schemes in which we are immersed in the guidelines and imperatives of the time, centered on a neoliberal form of thought that has sometimes led people and institutions acting without the necessary discernments so that their actions would not be based on the principle of the common good. The first part contains the object of such reflection, and the articles in the second part of this issue have, inadvertently, the resonance of a logical-ethical blend. © Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales.
Downloads
References
Budd, J. M., Sievert, M. E., & Schultz, T. R. (July 15th, 1998). Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA, 280(3), 296-297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.296
Gutiérrez, S. A., Barbosa, H. J., Cuero, M. S., Duarte, E. J., Gaitán, F. E., Lozano, J. L., … Vallejo, G. A. (octubre-diciembre, 2016). La retractación y la corrección de la literatura científica para conservar la integridad y la confianza en la ciencia: un análisis de retractaciones de publicaciones biomédicas de libre acceso en PubMed, 1959-2015. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 40(157), 568-579. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.399
Karabag, S. F., Berggren, C. (2016). Misconduct, marginality and editorial practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0159492. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159492
Moylan, E. C., & Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: A retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. BMJ Open, 6, e012047. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047
Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (December, 2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205-1226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
Piaget, J. (1932). The Moral Judgement of the Child. Illinois: The Free Press. Retrieved from https://ia800205.us.archive.org/5/items/moraljudgmentoft005613mbp/moraljudgmentoft005613mbp.pdf
Schmidt, F. L., & Oh, I-S. (June, 2016). The crisis of confidence in research findings in Psychology: Is lack of replication the real problem? Or is it something else? Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4(1), 32-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/arc0000029
Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 249-253. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.040923
Torres Fonseca, A., Barragán Meijueiro, M. de las M. y Nava Ramírez, V. (octubre-diciembre, 2011). ¿En la actualidad la ciencia tiene credibilidad? Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas, 16(4), 191-192. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47321154001
Trikalinos, N. A., Evangelou, E., & Ioannidis, J. P.A. (May, 2008). Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(5), 464-470. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.019
Wang, J., Ku, J., Alotaibi, N. M., & Rutka, J. T. (April, 2017). Retraction of Neurosurgical publications: A systematic review. World Neurosurgery. In press, accepted manuscript. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.014
Yan, J., MacDonald, A., Baisi, L.-P., Evaniew, N., Bhandari, M., Ghert, M. (June, 2016). Retractions in orthopaedic research. A systematic review. Bone & Joint Research, 5(6), 263-268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.56.BJR-2016-0047
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
La revista y los textos individuales que en esta se divulgan están protegidos por las leyes de copyright y por los términos y condiciones de la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Sin Derivar 4.0 Internacional.