Técnicas para formar la intuición en la caja de herramientas adaptativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/22161201.2452Palabras clave:
Intuición, Caja de herramientas adaptativa, Formación de la intuición, Técnicas de formaciónResumen
La intuición como tema de investigación ha cobrado importancia. Se parte de la Caja de herramientas adaptativa de Gerd Gigerenzer para hallar técnicas para su formación. En su teoría se encuentran pocos aportes explícitos, aunque pueden inferirse algunos; también se presentan propuestas a partir de la discusión con otros autores. Se proponen recomendaciones generales, entre las que destacan el análisis de los heurísticos y la retroalimentación, así como la selección o desarrollo de ambientes de aplicación. Luego, de acuerdo con una clasificación de heurísticos de Gigerenzer (2000, 2007b, 2008), se exponen técnicas específicas. Por último, se retoman aportes de Hogarth (2001, 2003), Klein (2003), Lopera y otros (2010), Sadler-Smith y Shefy (2004, 2007; 2006) para contrastar los hallazgos.Descargas
Referencias
Berretty, P., Todd, P., & Blythe, P. (1997). Categorization by elimination: A fast and frugal approach to categorization. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 43–48.
Carlson, N. (2004). Physiology of behavior. New York: Pearson Education.
Claxton, G. (2000). The Anatomy of Intuition. In The intuitive practitioner On the value of not always knowing what one is doing (pp. 32–52).
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2016). Ley 1805 de 2016. Retrieved from http://es.presidencia.gov.co/normativa/normativa/LEY 1805 DEL 04 DE AGOSTO DE 2016.pdf
Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 586–598. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.586
Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Psychological challenges for normative models. In D. Gabbay & P. Smets (Eds.), Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems: Vol. 1. Quantified representation of uncertainty and imprecision (pp. 441–467). Dordretch: Kluwer. Retrieved from https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/volltexte/institut/dok/full/gg/ggpcfhodr/ggpcfhodr.html
Gigerenzer, G. (2001a). Decision Making : Nonrational Theories. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 3304–3309). Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26017-0
Gigerenzer, G. (2001b). The adaptive toolbox: Toward a Darwinian rationality? In J. French, A. Kamil, & W. Leger (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 47. Evolutionary Psychology and motivation (pp. 113–143). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2003). The adaptive toolbox and life span development: Common questions? In Understanding human development: Dialogues with Lifespan Psychology (pp. 423–435). Dordretch: Kluwer.
Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Heuristics. In G. Gigerenzer & C. Engel (Eds.), Heuristics and the law (pp. 17–44). Cambridge: MA: MIT press. Retrieved from http://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/ft/gg/GG_Heuristics_2006.pdf
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Decisiones instintivas. Barcelona: Ariel.
Gigerenzer, G. (2015). Risk savvy: How to make good decisions. New York: Penguin.
Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2012). Homo Heuristicus and the Bias-Variance dilemma. In Action, perception and the brain: Adaptation and cephalic expression (pp. 68–91). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Goldstein, D. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In Simple Heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97–118). New York: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<161::AID-BDM348>3.0.CO;2-P
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
Gigerenzer, G., García-Retamero, R., & Takezawa, M. (2006). How to learn good cue orders : When social learning benefits simple heuristics. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society.
Gigerenzer, G., García-Retamero, R., & Takezawa, M. (2009). Incidencia del aprendizaje grupal en los procesos de adquisición de información. Psicothema, 21(3), 369–375.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The Take the best heuristic. In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (pp. 75–95). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(1), 75–90. http://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.1.75
Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D., Hogarth, R., Kacelnik, A., Kareev, Y., Klein, G., … Schlag, K. (2001). Group report: Why and when do simple heuristics work? In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 173–190). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Henrich, J., Albers, W., Boyd, R., McCabe, K., Ockenfels, A., & Young, P. (2001). Group report: What is the role of culture in bounded rationality? In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 343–359). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Goldstein, D. (2008). Fast and frugal heuristics are plausible models of cognition: Reply to Dougherty, Franco-Watkins, and Thomas (2008). Psychological Review, 115(1), 230–239. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.230
Gigerenzer, G., & Hutchinson, J. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69(2), 97–124. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.019
Gigerenzer, G., & Katsikopoulos, K. (2013). Modeling decision heuristics. In The Oxford Handbook of cognitive engineering (pp. 490–500). New York: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199757183.013.0034
Gigerenzer, G., & Kruglanski, A. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97–109. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020762
Gigerenzer, G., & Kurzenhäuser, S. (2005). Fast and frugal heuristics in medical decision making. In Science and medicine in dialogue: Thinking through particulars and universals (pp. 3–15). Westport: Praeger.
Gigerenzer, G., Marewski, J., & Schooler, L. (2010). Five principles for studying people’s use of heuristics. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42(1), 72–87. http://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00072
Gigerenzer, G., Pachur, T., Todd, P., Schooler, L., & Goldstein, D. (2011). The recognition heuristic: A review of theory and tests. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(JUL), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00147
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (1999a). Fast and frugal heuristics: the adaptive toolbox. In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (pp. 3–34). New York: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0171006
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (1999b). What we have learned (so far). In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (pp. 356–365). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (2000). Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 727-741-780. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003447
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (2007a). Environments That Make Us Smart. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 167–172.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (2007b). Mechanisms of ecological rationality heuristics and envirom¡nements that make us smart. In The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 197–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (2008). Rationality the fast and frugal way: Introduction. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1(C), 976–986. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00105-9
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & Rieskamp, J. (2008). Social heuristics. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1(C), 1035–1046. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00110-2
Goldstein, D., & Gigerenzer, G. (2008). The Recognition heuristic and the Less-is-more effect. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1(C), 987–992. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00106-0
Hodgkinson, G., Langan-Fox, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: a fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 99(Pt 1), 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X216666
Hoffrage, U., & García-Retamero, R. (2006). How causal knowledge simplifies decision-making. Mind Mach, 16, 365–380. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-006-9035-1
Hogarth, R. (2001). Educating intuition. University of Chicago Press.
Hogarth, R. (2003). Education Intuition : A Challenge for the 21st Century. Els Opuscles Del CREI, 13(september), 1–19.
Klein, G. (2003). The power of intuition. New York: Currency-Doubleday.
Klein, G. (2015). A naturalistic decision making perspective on studying intuitive decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 164–168. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.001
La enciclopedia de ciencias y tecnologías en Argentina. (2017). Técnica - EXyT-ar. Retrieved May 29, 2017, from http://cyt-ar.com.ar/cyt-ar/index.php/Técnica
Lerner, J., & Gil, L. M. (2006). Metodología del aprendizaje. Medellín: Fondo editorial Universidad EAFIT.
Lopera, J. D., Ramírez, C. A., Zuluaga, M. U., & Ortiz, J. (2010). El Método Analítico. Medellín: Centro de Investigaciones Sociales y Humanas (CISH), Universidad de Antioquia.
Mavor, P., Sadler‐Smith, E., & Gray, D. E. (2010a). Teaching and learning intuition: some implications for HRD and coaching practice. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(8/9), 822–838. http://doi.org/10.1108/03090591011080995
Mavor, P., Sadler‐Smith, E., & Gray, D. E. (2010b). Teaching and learning intuition: some implications for HRD and coaching practice. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(8/9), 822–838. http://doi.org/10.1108/03090591011080995
Miller, C., & Ireland, D. (2005). Intuition in strategic decision making: Friend or foe in the fast-paced 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 19–30.
Ramírez, C. A. (2011). El método de eliminación en la lógica y la psicología. Medellín: Departamento de Matemáticas de la Universidad de Antioquia.
Ramírez, C. A., Lopera, J. D., Zuluaga, M. U., & Ortiz, J. (2017). El método analítico - Volumen I: Formalizción teórica. Bogotá: San Pablo.
Rowan, R. (1986). The intuitive manager. Boston: Little Brown.
Sadler-Smith, E., & Shefy, E. (2004). The intuitive executive: Understanding and applying “gut feel” in decision-making.
Academy of Management Executive, 18(4), 76–91. http://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2004.15268692
Sadler-Smith, E., & Shefy, E. (2007). Developing intuitive awareness in management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(2), 186–205. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2007.25223458
Shefy, E., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2006). Applying holistic principles in management development. Journal of Management Development, 25(4), 368–385. http://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610655837
Simon, H. (1957). Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281–299. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0032955
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
La revista y los textos individuales que en esta se divulgan están protegidos por las leyes de copyright y por los términos y condiciones de la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Sin Derivar 4.0 Internacional.
