Display or philosophical decline: an inactual crisis?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21501/25907565.3040

Abstract

It is true that, in the Musée d'Orsay, Ónice's work has a glow for its reckless title: "Nature discovering itself before science", but they forget that the first philosophers known as physis philosophers had already built the relationship philosophy-science. For example Democritus, philosophized about the becomings or changes in nature, makes it clear that everything that moves is in constant evolution. With this theory is framed an eternal return between science and philosophy; the changes are constant, and turns are allowed in the views from philosophy as well as from the sciences. They are in a constant becoming together.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Elizabeth Mejía Muñoz, Universidad Católica de Manizales

Medellín-Antioquia

References

Azcárraga, J. A. (2002). Ciencia y filosofía. Documento de trabajo.

Bunge, M. (2016). Filosofía para médicos. Madrid, España: Gedisa.

Colli, G. (2008). La naturaleza ama esconderse. Madrid, España: Biblioteca de Ensayos Siruela.

Deleuze, G. (2008). Dos regímenes de locos. Barcelona, España: Pre-textos.

Hadot, P. (2006). Ejercicios espirituales. Madrid, España: Siruela.

Hadot, P. (2015). El velo de Isis. Barcelona, España: Ediciones Alpha Decay.

Popper, K. (1962). La lógica de la investigación científica. Madrid, España: Tecnos.

Spinoza, B. (2007). Obras completas. Valencia, España: Alianza Editorial.

Published

2018-12-13

How to Cite

Mejía Muñoz, M. E. (2018). Display or philosophical decline: an inactual crisis?. Revista Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, (2), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.21501/25907565.3040

Issue

Section

Editorial