La investigación sobre el uso de sustancias psicoactivas en la ciudad de Bogotá: entre 1985 y 2005
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/24631779.2263Keywords:
Sustancias psicoactivas, Aspectos sociales y culturales del uso de sustancias psicoactivas, Discurso científicoAbstract
Este artículo de reflexión presenta los resultados del análisis de las investigaciones sobre el uso de sustancias psicoactivas (SPA), realizadas desde el campo de las ciencias sociales, entre 1985 y 2005 en la ciudad de Bogotá. Da cuenta de los enfoques teóricos y metodológicos a partir de los cuales se abordó el fenómeno en el periodo observado, así como de algunas tendencias o ejes temáticos (concepto de SPA, actores, formas de interacción, prácticas sociales, representaciones y contextos). El análisis de estos trabajos permitió reconocer los avances en el conocimiento sobre el tema, así como los vacíos dejados, abriendo la posibilidad de plantear nuevas preguntas de investigación.
Downloads
References
Alba, A. (1993). El imaginario “droga”: realidad mítica. [Tesis de grado en Comunicación Social]. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Comunicación Social.
Alonso, L. (1998). La mirada cualitativa en sociología. Madrid: Editorial Fundamentos.
Artunduaga, C., Cadena, L. y Wilson J. (2003). Las narrativas que construyen los jóvenes consumidores de éxtasis acerca del consumo de éxtasis en las fiestas electrónicas. [Tesis de Pregrado en Psicología]. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Psicología.
Granados, C. y Munive, C. (2001). Narrativas sobre éxtasis de un grupo de jóvenes asistentes a los “after party”. [Tesis de pregrado en Psicología]. Universidad de los Andes. Facultad de Psicología.
Mican de Francisco, M. (1988). Aspectos culturales sobre el uso de sustancias psicoactivas en la Universidad Nacional. [Tesis de pregrado en Antropología]. Universidad Nacional. Facultad de Antropología.
Mora, J. y Avendaño, F. (2004). Culturas juveniles, cannabis y ciudad: una aproximación etnográfica en Bogotá a comienzos del siglo XXI. [Tesis de pregrado en Licenciatura en Ciencias Sociales]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Facultad de Ciencias y Educación.
Navarrete, K. (1998). Las representaciones sociales del éxtasis desde el punto de vista de las motivaciones, las actitudes, la socialización y la construcción de identidad. Bogotá: [Tesis de pregrado en Psicología]. Universidad de los Andes. Facultad de Psicología.
Ronderos, V. J. (2000). Prácticas socioculturales sobre el uso de drogas en Manizales. Revista Cultura y Droga, 5(5), 33- 51. Recuperado de: http://200.21.104.25/culturaydroga/downloads/Cultura%20y%20Droga%205.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The authors are morally and legally responsible for the content of their articles, as well as respect for copyright. Therefore, these do not compromise in any way the Luis Amigó University Foundation.
The reproduction of the articles will be governed as described in http://creativecommons.org/
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send the statement of assignment of economic rights and the declaration of conflicts of interest in favor of the journal. Said document will be provided by the Editor and indicates the originality of the article, which is not published and which is not simultaneously postulated in another medium.
• The address of the journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will confirm to the author, in a maximum of three (3) days, the reception of the received contribution, if its sending is done through the electronic mail; or immediately, if it is entered through the OJS (Open Journal Systems). The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them.
• The journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee; In case the Committee finds the material relevant, it will be evaluated by anonymous arbitrators, who will determine if it is publishable.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to remove it in any part of the process.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine or the OJS.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that the author considers to modify and that are not structurally adjusted to a type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of their contact information and institutional affiliation.
• The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism and self-plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, and that the article is not original and unpublished.
• The editor will verify the relevance of the article, in accordance with the policies of the journal and supported by Turnitin's Originality Check, software that detects errors in the handling of appointments, possible copies and plagiarism. If it considers it viable, it will send the article to the arbitrators; otherwise it will report the findings to the author and discard it. The articles must have a minimum originality level of 75%.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the publisher discovers plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of data of the content and the author or substantive errors that attempt against the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) A third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.
• The opinions contained in the articles are attributable exclusively to the authors; therefore, the Institution is not responsible for what they may generate.
