Violation of constitutional and legal principles in contract no. 638 of 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/23394536.3110Keywords:
State Contract, Road Maintenance, Violation, Constitutional Principles, Legal and non-regulated principlesAbstract
The purpose of this research was to find the principles of contracting in contract n. ° 638 of 2013. The study is qualitative, the hermeneutic method, the approach used is analytical descriptive in the interpretation of the state contract of the fill holes machine of Bogotá, identify and decompose the parts or elements of the phenomenon and thus observe its causes, the nature and the effects. In the dynamics of the methodological design a legal theoretical triangulation was carried out (constitutional, jurisprudential and normative), starting from bibliographic and graphic web sources of the constitutional, legal, regulatory norms, jurisprudence of the High Courts, specialized doctrine in the contracting of goods and reports proffered in The administrative action by the fiscal control bodies. The data collection was used from different sources, which provided diverse interpretations in the analysis of the violated principles of State contracting, through bibliographic cards, reading cards, analytical summaries and documentary analysis. The investigation concluded that the contracts No. 638 of 2013 violated the principles of planning, effectiveness, efficiency, economy, publicity and the constitutional and fundamental principles of the prevalence of the general interest, the essential purposes of the State in connection with the right fundamental equality.Downloads
References
Acuerdo No. 19 de 1972 del Concejo de Bogotá D.C. “Por el cual se crea y reglamenta el funcionamiento del Instituto de Desarrollo Urbano”.
Acuerdo No. 257 de 2006, artículo 109 del Concejo de Bogotá D.C. “Por el cual se dictan normas básicas sobre la estructura, organización y funcionamiento de los organismos y de las entidades de Bogotá, Distrito Capital, y se expiden otras disposiciones”.
Aponte, I. (2014). Las fallas de planeación y su incidencia en el contrato estatal de obra. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo Universidad Externado de Colombia, 11, 177-207. Recuperado de http://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/view/3831/4087
Consejo de Estado, Sala de Consulta y Servicio Civil, Concepto 1439 de 2002, Consejero Ponente: María Elena Giraldo.
Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Tercera, Sentencia del 29 de agosto de 2007, Consejero Ponente:Mauricio Eduardo Rosasco Estupiñan.
Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Tercera, Sentencia del 3 de diciembre del 2007, Consejero Ponente: Ruth Stella Correa Palacio.
Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Tercera, Sentencia del 31 de enero del 2011, Consejera Ponente: Olga Melida Valle De la Hoz.
Consejo de Estado, Sala Contenciosa Administrativa, Sección Tercera, Sentencia del 24 de abril de 2013, Consejero Ponente: Jaime Orlando Santofimio Gamboa.
Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección tercera, Sentencia del 27 de enero de 2016, Consejero Ponente: Jaime Orlando Santofimio Gamboa.
Contraloría de Bogotá, Informe final de visita fiscal, del 25 de febrero del 2014.
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia C-711 de 2012, Magistrado Ponente: Mauricio González Cuervo.
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia C-826 de 2013, Magistrado Ponente: Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva.
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-406/92, Magistrado Ponente: Ciro Angarita Barón.
Constitución Nacional de Colombia. 1991.
Decreto No. 591 de 1991, “Por el cual se regulan las modalidades específicas de contratos de fomento de actividades científicas y
tecnológicas”.
Decreto No. 2474 de 2008, “Por el cual se reglamentan parcialmente la Ley 80 de 1993 y la Ley 1150 de 2007 sobre las modalidades de selección, publicidad, selección objetiva, y se dictan otras disposiciones”.
Ley No. 80 de 1993, “Por la cual se expide el Estatuto General de Contratación de la Administración Pública”
Ley No. 1150 de 2007, “Por medio de la cual se introducen medidas para la eficiencia y la transparencia en la Ley 80 de 1993 y se dictan otras disposiciones generales sobre la contratación con Recursos Públicos”.
Ley 489 de 1998. Diario Oficial No. 43.464, de 30 de diciembre de 1998.
Por la cual se dictan normas sobre la organización y funcionamiento de las entidades del orden nacional.
Ley 1437 de 2011. Diario Oficial No. 47.956 de 18 de enero de 201. Por la cual se expide el Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo.
Ley 29 de 1990. Por la cual se dictan disposiciones para el fomento de la investigación científica y el desarrollo tencnológico y se otorgan facultades extraordinarias. Recuperado de https://www.colciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/reglamentacion/ley-29-1990.pdf
Manrique, A. (2010). Fundamentos de la Organización y del Funcionamiento del Estado Colombiano. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Dike.
Rodríguez, L. (2007). Derecho Administrativo general y colombiano. 15ª edición, Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Temis.
Rosero, B. C. (2012). Contratación Estatal: Manual Teórico Práctico. Bogotá: Ediciones de la U.
Tafur, A. (1995). Derecho Administrativo General. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Ciencia y Derecho, segunda edición.
Unidad Administrativa Especial de Rehabilitación y Mantenimiento Vial, Informe de prensa del 6 de noviembre del 2015
Unidad de Mantenimiento Vial, Programa de Ciencia y Tecnología. Alcaldía de Bogotá – Contrato 638 de 20132013
Sentencia C-849 de 2005, M.P. Jaime Araujo Rentería http://www.corteconstitucional.
gov.co/relatoria/2005/c-849-05.htm Vidal, J. (2008). Derecho Administrativo. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Legis.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION AND GOOD PRACTICES
Responsibilities of the Director / Editor:
The Director / Editor, following the code of conduct, is the person in charge of selecting the articles that will be part of the volumes of the Journal. Therefore, and for the selection of the articles, the academic level and the thematic relevance will be observed, in consequence, it is to clarify that the discrimination by gender, sexual orientation, nationality, ethnic origin or religious or political manifestations, will not be reason or selection criteria.
The Director / Editor, may discuss the decisions regarding the selection of articles taken by other bodies of the publication, always under the quality criteria.
In relation to the authors, the Director / Editor must maintain the confidentiality of the decisions that are made.
Finally, the Director / Editor will not process articles that result in conflicts of interest as a result of any possible relationship with them.
Responsibilities of the evaluators:
Evaluators must maintain confidentiality about the articles they receive.
For ethical, academic and scientific principles, objectivity, reasonableness and neutrality are important when formulating observations.
In this order, they can support the Director / Editor and the author with their suggestions, always in favor of maintaining the academic quality of the articles they have evaluated.
They must abstain from using for their benefit or from a third party the material to arbitrate, as well as being part of evaluation processes from which a conflict of interest may arise.
It is expected that the evaluators will comply with the assigned times for their arbitration and communicate to the Director / Editor about their possibility to review in a timely and appropriate manner the articles sent to be evaluated.
Responsibilities of the authors:
Comply with the rules of publication and the code of ethics that Summa Iuris accepts, which is why the articles must be original and unpublished and must not be in the process of being evaluated in another Journal.
Researchers must seek the contribution and development of the Legal Sciences and Human Rights, consequently, in their articles they commit to present truthful and reliable data, references and complete sources, in order that other researchers can corroborate, discuss or support what that in them is exposed.
The respective recognition of its authorship must be given to the people who participated in the construction and writing of the article. In addition, respect the integrity of the communities that participate in the research and guarantee the presentation of the formats that account for the voluntary and dignified participation of these.
In this order of ideas, information on funding sources in the research should be transparent.
Finally, researchers must inform about errors or inaccuracies that have been published in their own research.
Procedure to resolve conflicts:
Who make any claim, must identify the concurrence of a behavior that contravenes the ethical principles of the Journal, which is why they must provide the respective evidence that demonstrates and support the claim.
Claims
If once the article is published: 1. The publisher discovers plagiarism, adulteration, or falsification of data of the content and the author or errors of background that threaten the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2. If a third party detects the error, it is the author's obligation to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction. 3. During the editing process, the authors must report to the Director / Editor any error or inaccuracy that they identify in the material sent; If the article is published with such faults, they must request the Revista the correction or immediate retraction.
Consequently, the opinions contained in the articles are attributable exclusively to the authors; therefore, Luis Amigó Catholic University is not responsible for what they may generate.
All claims will be received in writing by email to summaiuris@amigo.edu.co
The maximum response time will be three (3) business days from the receipt of the non-compliance.
Copyright and access to the publication
Moral rights. The authors are recognized as authors of the work and the integrity of the work is protected. Authors may have additional rights to their articles, as established in their agreement with the Journal. In addition, they are morally and legally responsible for the content of their texts, as well as respect for the copyrights of the works consulted and those cited therein; therefore, do not compromise in any way the thinking of the committees, the editorial team, the evaluators, or the Luis Amigó Catholic University.
License
The Magazine and the individual texts that are disclosed herein are protected by copyright laws and the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative 4.0 International License. © 2018 Luis Amigó Catholic University. Permits that go beyond what is covered by this license can be found at http://www.funlam.edu.co/modules/fondoeditorial/
Publication and disclosure
Summa Iuris is of semiannual character. It publishes two numbers per year, corresponding to the periods January-June and July-December.
The complete Journal and the individual texts are published in PDF and HTML formats in the Open Journal Systems in the following link: http://www.funlam.edu.co/Revista s / index.php / summaiuris / index.
The Journal and each article have a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), which facilitates its location on the Internet, this tool guarantees the preservation of access to the content of the Magazine in case it stops publishing.
The Journal uses the advance publication, with the purpose of responding to the needs of validity of the content and the requirements of the authors and the medium. This resource is used once the satisfactory concepts of peer evaluators have been obtained; the provisional publication contains the latest version sent by the authors, without the style correction, translation and layout being made yet.
Summa Iuris Magazine uses, among other media, social and academic networks to disseminate its content. https://www.facebook.com/summaiuris/
Receiving contributions
Articles must be submitted through the Open Journal System (OJS), administration software and publication of the Journal that allows the tracking of documents in their different stages. They can also be sent to the e-mail of the Magazine (summaiuris@amigo.edu.co).
Online submissions require a username and password, which can be requested at:
http://www.funlam.edu.co/Revista s / index.php / summaiuris / user / register
No printed articles or partial versions of the text will be received, since they must be adjusted to any of the types of articles described in the guide for authors of the Journal.
The address of the Journal will respond within a maximum of three (3) days about the receipt of the document, but this does not imply or require its publication.
Queries for the referral can be sent to the e-mail of the Journal (summaiuris@amigo.edu.co).
Commitment of the authors and assignment of rights
Once the Director / Editor verifies the fulfillment of the minimum requirements, he will ask the authors to: 1) declare that the work is original, unpublished, is not being evaluated simultaneously in another Journal, besides committing not to remove the article after peer evaluation, if this determines the viability of the publication, either in the current state or with modifications; 2) declare the inexistence of conflicts of interest and manifest the transfer of economic rights in favor of the Luis Amigó Catholic University. 3) authorize the processing of your personal data.
Publication of author data.
Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of the personal data related in the author's note.
Authorization for data processing
The Luis Amigó Catholic University, responsible for data processing and complying with Law 1581 of 2012 and Decree 1377 of 2013, states that the personal data of the members of the committees, evaluators and authors are included in the bases of institutional data and are for the exclusive use of the University. According to the privacy policy, which can be consulted on our website www.ucatolicaluisamigo.edu.co, the data is not shared or provided to third parties without the prior authorization of the owner. In addition, the Institution has the appropriate technological means to ensure that they are stored safely and reliably.
In accordance with the above, it is mandatory during the editing process of Summa Iuris, to authorize the Luis Amigó Catholic University for the processing of personal data, for the purposes of the Institution.
Privacy statement. All the data of authors, committees, evaluators and other collaborators of Summa Iuris introduced in the OJS platform and / or in the articles, will be used exclusively for the inclusion of the Journal in Indexing and Summary Systems and the purposes declared by it and they will not be available for any other purpose or another person.
Edition closing
The reception of the articles is permanent, but they are established as closing dates for their selection: the last day of the month of February for the number corresponding to the period of July-December; and the last day of August for the number published in January-June.
After these deadlines, it begins with the correction of style, layout, review of samples and others, typical of the process of public disposition of the material. Given the number of articles received, the review and evaluation process is carried out according to the order of arrival; the time fixed between the receipt of the research articles and their publication is four (4) months.
Guarantee of the Ethics Committee
In order to demonstrate that the necessary permits are available from the natural and legal persons involved in the investigation, the Journal should be sent the endorsement of the Ethics Committee and the informed consent and consent of the investigation.
