Study of the 10%investment of the resources allocated to the Science, Technology and Innovation Fund through the General Royalty System, department of Caquetá
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/2500-669X.3494Keywords:
Investment projects, Society, Science, Technology, InnovationAbstract
The resources that are being executed through investment projects that must have an influence on society are numerous, it is intended to analyze how the implementation of the Science, Technology and Innovation Fund has been through 10% of the General System of Royalties, in the department of Caquetá 2013-2015, in order to show what projects are being carried out and what impact this system has generated for the benefitof the region. Interviews were made to the planning secretaries of the different municipalities of the department, as well as surveys to learn about the importance and execution of Science Technology and Innovation resources in the department of Caquetá, in total there were 232 people surveyed, from which 40% have knowledge about the Science and Technology Innovation Fund, 60% said they have no knowledge on the subject. For this reason, the government and mayors of the department of Caquetá are urged to make known the execution of the resources allocated by the
General System of Royalties.
Downloads
References
Arbeláez, M. A., & Parra-Torrado, M. (2011). Innovation, R&D Investment and Productivity in Colombian Firms. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). In: IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-251. Retrieved from https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Innovation-RD-Investment-and-Productivity-in-Colombian-Firms.pdf.
Becerra, Y. (2015). Sistema general de regalías: nuevos recursos para la ciencia, tecnología e innovación en Colombia. Revista CEA, 1(1), 75-91.
Bonilla, E. y Rodríguez, P. (2005). Más allá del dilema de los métodos: La investigación en ciencias sociales. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Norma.
COLCIENCIAS. (s.f). ¿Cuál es la diferencia del SGR y Colciencias? ¿A cuál puedo presentar proyectos?. Recuperado de: https://legadoweb.colciencias.gov.co/faq/cu-l-es-la-diferencia-del-sgr-y-colciencias-cu-l-puedo-presentar-proyectos
Congreso de Colombia. Acto Legislativo 05 de 2011. Por el cual se crea el Sistema General de Regalías en Colombia. Recuperado de: http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Normativa/actos-legislativos/Documents/2011/ActoLegislativo-05-18julio2011.pdf
Congreso de Colombia. (17 de mayo de 2012). Ley 1530 de 2012. Por la cual se regula la organización y el funcionamiento del sistema general de regalías. DOI: 48.433. Recuperado de http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1530_2012.html.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2012). Guía Sectorial de Programas y Proyectos de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Recuperado de: https://www.colciencias.gov.co/portafolio/gestion-territorial/guia-sectorial/cartilla
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2012). Resolución 0252 del 22 de febrero de 2012. Recuperado de: https://www.anm.gov.co/sites/default/files/res_252_de_2012_.pdf.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2012b). Manual metodológico general para la identificación, preparación, programación y evaluación de proyectos. Recuperado de http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co/bitstream/handle/11146/34026/33guiasectorial-ctei-gestionterritorial.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Diario El Nuevo Siglo. Co. (2013). 10 % de regalías para ciencia y tecnología.. Recuperado de https://www.elnuevosiglo.com.co/articulos/8-2013-10-de-regalias-para-ciencia-y-tecnologia
Gómez, H. J. y Mitchell, D. (2014). Innovación y emprendimiento en Colombia: balance, perspectivas y recomendaciones de política, 2014-2018. Cuaderno 50 de Fedesarrollo. Recuperado de https://www.repository.fedesarrollo.org.co/bitstream/handle/11445/149/CDF_No_50_Marzo_2014.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Hernández-Sampieri, R. (2006). Definición del tipo de investigación a realizar: básicamente exploratoria, descriptiva, correlacional o explicativa. En Metodología de la Investigación. México: McGraw-Hill. Recuperado de https://idolotec.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/sampieri-cap-4.pdf.
Martínez, J. (2011). Métodos de Investigación Cualitativa. Revista Silogismo N. 08. Julio-Diciembre. Recuperado de: http://www.cide.edu.co/doc/investigacion/3.%20metodos%20de%20investigacion.pdf
Núñez, J., Castro, F., Gordillo, A., Roveda, G. y Steiner, R. (2015). Levantamiento y consolidación de la línea de base de las inversiones financiadas con recursos del Fondo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (Informe final). Fedesarrollo. Recuperado de http://repositorio.colciencias.gov.co/bitstream/handle/11146/124/1230-Levantamiento%20de%20l%C3%ADnea%20de%20base%20FCT%20de%20Ragalias%208may.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Órgano Colegiado de Administración y Decisión (OCAD). (FCTel). Sistema General de Regalías. Acuerdo 015 de 2014. Recuperado de http://www.colciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/reportes/acuerdo15-2014.pdf.
Presidencia de la República de Colombia. (22 de mayo de 2012). Decreto 1075 de 2012. Por el cual se reglamenta la organización y funcionamiento de los Órganos Colegiados de Administración y Decisión y las secretarías técnicas, de acuerdo con lo establecido en el artículo 6 de la Ley N° 1530 de 2012. Recuperado de http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Normativa/Decretos/2012/Documents/Mayo/22/dec107522052012.pdf.
Presidencia de la República de Colombia. (22 de mayo de 2012). Decreto 1077 de 2012. Por el cual se reglamenta parcialmente la Ley No. 1530 de 2012 en materia presupuestal y se dictan otras disposiciones. Recuperado de https://www.anm.gov.co/sites/default/files/decreto_1077_de_2012.pdf.
Presidencia de la República de Colombia. (17 de mayo de 2012). Decreto 1077 de 2012. En donde se reglamenta parcialmente la Ley No. 1530 de 2012 Por la cual se regula la organización y el funcionamiento del Sistema General de Regalías. Recuperado de http://www2.igac.gov.co/igac_web/normograma_files/LEY%201530%20DE%202012.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Science of Human Action
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send completed the declaration of transfer of economic rights and declaration of conflicts of interest, which will be provided by the management of the magazine. This document indicates the originality of the article, which is not published in another medium and that is not simultaneously postulated in another journal.
• The author will transfer all rights to the article to the journal Science Of Human Action.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to withdraw it until the end of the process.
• The Science Of Human Action journal will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee, in case the Committee finds the material pertinent, it will be evaluated by two anonymous referees who will determine if it is publishable. If one referee approves and the other rejects it, a third party will be appointed.
• The address of Science Of Human Action will answer within a maximum of three (3) days about the receipt of the contribution received from the author.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that are not structurally adjusted to the type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of these data.
• The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them. The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
• Once the article is submitted, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of the data corresponding to the author's note.
• This is an open access journal that does not charge authors for either the editorial process or the publication. All costs of editorial production are assumed by the Luis Amigó Catholic University.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, which are not original and unpublished.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the author discovers substantive errors that threaten the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) If a third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.