Support and government programs as a source of financing for the livestock industry: a comparative study Mexico, Costa Rica

Authors

  • Itzel Gutiérrez Jiménez Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes-México
  • Eduardo Barrantes Guevara Universidad Técnica Nacional. Balsa de Atenas, Costa Rica
  • Virginia Guzmán Díaz de León Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes-México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21501/2500-669X.2923

Keywords:

Financing, Funding sources, Government supports, Mexico cattle industry, Costa Rica cattle industry.

Abstract

For a company to be successful, access to financing sources is fundamental. The livestock industry in Latin America is a marginal sector of credit. The governments of countries such as Mexico and Costa Rica promote different supports or programs so that producers can access financing. In the case of Mexico, non-reimbursable support is granted for investments in strategic productive areas, and Costa Rica grants financing programs with low rates, grace period, guarantees, terms and accessible payments, in some cases the financing is accompanied by non-reimbursable support, technical assistance and training. In both countries, this aid represents a very important source of financing, since for a large part of the livestock companies it is the only option to access a credit. The objective of this study is to compare the support and government programs for livestock in Mexico and Costa Rica, to determine their relevance as a source of financing. The research is documentary, descriptive in nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Itzel Gutiérrez Jiménez, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes-México

Antioquia, Medellín

References

BCCR. (2017a). Tasa Básica Diaria. Recuperado de http://indicadoreseconomicos.bccr.fi.cr/indicadoreseconomicos/Cuadros/frmVerCatCuadro.aspx?idioma=1&CodCuadro=%2017

BCCR. (2017b). Tasa de interés activa promedio del Sistema Financiero para préstamos en moneda nacional. Recuperado de http://indicadoreseconomicos.bccr.fi.cr/indicadoreseconomicos/Cuadros/frmVerCatCuadro.aspx?idioma=1&CodCuadro=%20614#Notas614

Carmiol González, G. (2016). Comportamiento del crédito otorgado al Sector Agropucuario 2011-2015. Costa Rica: Secretaría Ejecutiva de Planificación Sectorial Agropecuaria. Recuperado de http://www.sepsa.go.cr/DOCS/2016-008-Comportamiento_credito_Sector_Agro_2011-2015.pdf

De Olloqui, F., y Fernández Diéz, M. C. (2017). Financiamiento del sector agroalimentario y desarrollo rutal. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Recuperado de https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/8252/Financiamiento-del-sector-agroalimentario-y-el-desarrollo-rural.pdf?sequence=1

Escalante, R., Catalán, H., y Basurto, S. (2013). Determinantes del crédito en el sector agropecuario mexicano: un análisis mediante un modelo Probit. Cuadernos de desarrollo rural, 10(71), 101-124.

FAO. (s.f.). Producción pecuaria en América Latina y el Caribe. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/americas/perspectivas/produccion-pecuaria/es/

Fuentes Méndez, L. A., y Gutiérrez, A. (2006). Paradigmas del mercado financiero rural en países en desarrollo. Agroalimentaria, 11(23), 21-41.

Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., y Baptista Lucio, P. (2010). Metología de la investigación (5.ª ed.). México: Mc Graw Hill.

Inder. (s.f.a). Acerca del Inder. Recuperado de https://www.inder.go.cr/acerca_del_inder/index.aspx

Inder. (s.f.b). Crédito Rural. Recuperado de https://www.inder.go.cr/servicios/credito_rural.aspx

INEGI. (2014). Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria ENA 2014. Conociendo el campo de México. México: SAGARPA, INEGI. Recuperado de http://internet.contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos//prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/nueva_estruc/promo/ena2014_pres.pdf

INEGI. (2017). Producto interno bruto. Recuperado de http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/cuadrosestadisticos/GeneraCuadro.aspx?s=est&nc=785&c=24393

INFOAGRO. (2017). Indicadores Económicos 2014-2017. Principales Indicadores del Sector Agropecuario. Recuperado de http://www.infoagro.go.cr/Paginas/IndicadoresEconomicos.aspx

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (2015). VI Censo Nacional Agropecuario. Costa Rica: INEC. Recuperado de http://www.mag.go.cr/bibliotecavirtual/U40-10581.pdf

Pérez, E., Conejo, A. M., y Zúñiga , J. (2016). Carne Bovina. Competitividad en sectores sensibles de la agricultura de Costa Rica ad portas de iniciarse la desgravación arancelaria en el marco del CAFTA. San José, Costa Rica.

SAGARPA. (s.f.). ¿Qué hacemos? Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/sagarpa/que-hacemos

SAGARPA. (2016). 4.º Informe de labores 2015-2016. México: Gobierno de la República. Recuperado de http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/Transparencia/POT_2016/Informe/CuartoInformeDeLabores_SAGARPA.pdf

SAGARPA. (2017a). Componente de Capitalización Productiva Pecuaria 2017. México: gob.mx. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/sagarpa/acciones-y-programas/componente-de-capitalizacion-productiva-pecuaria-2017-91652

SAGARPA. (2017b). Componente de Estrategias Integrales para la Cadena Productiva. México: gob.mx. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/sagarpa/acciones-y-programas/componente-de-estrategias-integrales-para-la-cadena-productiva-2018

SAGARPA. (2017c). Componente Repoblamiento y Recría Pecuaria 2015. México: gob.mx. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/sagarpa/acciones-y-programas/componente-repoblamiento-y-recria-pecuaria-2015

SBD. (s.f.a). Acerca del Sistema de Banca para el Desarrollo. Costa Rica: Sistema de Banca para el Desarrollo. Recuperado de https://sbdcr.com/webcenter/portal/sbdprod/pages_acercadesbd

SBD. (s.f.b). ¿Cómo puedo obtener un préstamo con recursos de Banca para el Desarrollo, si no tengo suficiente garantía? Costa Rica: Sistema de Banca para el Desarrollo. Recuperado de https://sbdcr.com/webcenter/portal/sbdprod/pages_comoaccedoalfinanciamiento#IF2

SBD (s.f.c). ¿Qué se puede financiar, según el programa aprobado al operador? Costa Rica: Sistema de Banca para el Desarrollo. Recuperado de https://sbdcr.com/webcenter/portal/sbdprod/pages_comoaccedoalfinanciamiento#IF2

SBD. (s.f.d). ¿Qué tiene que hacer para solicitar un crédito con recursos de Banca para el Desarrollo? Costa Rica: Sistema de Banca para el Desarrollo. Recuperado de https://sbdcr.com/webcenter/portal/sbdprod/pages_comoaccedoalfinanciamiento#IF3

SBD. (s.f.e). Recursos del Sistema de Banca para el Desarrollo. Costa Rica: Sistema de Banca para el Desarrollo. Recuperado de https://sbdcr.com/webcenter/portal/sbdprod/pages_recursos

Sicultura. (s.f.). Instituto de Desarrollo Rural (INDER). Costa Rica: Sicultura Recuperado de https://si.cultura.cr/content/instituto-de-desarrollo-rural-inder

Trejo González, E. (09 de octubre de 2017). La carne de res es mexicana. Ganadería.com Recuperado de http://www.ganaderia.com/destacado/La-carne-de-res-es-mexicana

Downloads

Published

2018-12-12

How to Cite

Gutiérrez Jiménez, I., Barrantes Guevara, E., & Guzmán Díaz de León, V. (2018). Support and government programs as a source of financing for the livestock industry: a comparative study Mexico, Costa Rica. Science of Human Action, 3(2), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.21501/2500-669X.2923

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Economía y Finanzas

License

PUBLICATIONS POLICY

 

• The author must send completed the declaration of transfer of economic rights and declaration of conflicts of interest, which will be provided by the management of the magazine. This document indicates the originality of the article, which is not published in another medium and that is not simultaneously postulated in another journal.

 

• The author will transfer all rights to the article to the journal Science Of Human Action.

 

• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to withdraw it until the end of the process.

 

• The Science Of Human Action journal will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee, in case the Committee finds the material pertinent, it will be evaluated by two anonymous referees who will determine if it is publishable. If one referee approves and the other rejects it, a third party will be appointed.

 

• The address of Science Of Human Action will answer within a maximum of three (3) days about the receipt of the contribution received from the author.

 

• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine.

 

• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that are not structurally adjusted to the type of article.

 

• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of these data.

 

• The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them. The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.

• Once the article is submitted, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of the data corresponding to the author's note.

 

• This is an open access journal that does not charge authors for either the editorial process or the publication. All costs of editorial production are assumed by the Luis Amigó Catholic University.

 

ETHICS OF PUBLICATION

 

• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.

 

• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, which are not original and unpublished.

 

• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.

• If once the article is published: 1) the author discovers substantive errors that threaten the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) If a third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.