Environmental dimension of company social responsibility in the hotel sector in riohacha (la guajira–Colombia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/2500-669X.2324Keywords:
Tourism, social entrepreneurial responsibility, hotel sector, environmental dimension.Abstract
This article aims to make an approach to the environmental social responsibility, from the perspective of Riohacha hotel sector (La Guajira-Colombia), with descriptive focus, and transactional – descriptive non- experimental hotel sector design. The purpose of this research was to determine the practices of entrepreneurial social responsibility, managed by hotel companies of Riohacha, that is why the environmental dimension variable of entrepreneurial-social responsibility was analyzed; a questionnaire was applied, the non-probabilistic sample of 20 hotels between one and three stars taken from a population of 62 hotels; the results showed that 85% of the hotels do not comply national environment laws of the sector, 25% of the hotels do not minimize the wastes of the processes of services supply, 63% search for the optimization of the consumption of electricity and water; and 65% of the companies have environmental awareness programs and recycling over the company´s areas. It was concluded that there is a lack of social-environmental responsibility, as well as gaps in the rules and policies implementation by managers and / or hotels´ owners for the Preservation of the Environment.Downloads
References
Camacho, J. (enero-junio, 2015). Las normas de responsabilidad social. Su dimensión en el ámbito laboral de las empresas. Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Social, (20), 3-29.
Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas. (2001). Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas. (2001). Libro verde: Fomentar un marco europeo para la responsabilidad social de las empresas. Bruselas.
Cumbre de Desarrollo Sostenible (2002). Plan de implantación de la Cumbre Mundial sobre el Desarrollo Sostenible. Johannesburgo.
Dyché, J. (2001). The CRM Handbook: A Business Guide to Customer Relationship Management. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
ICONTEC. (2008). Guía Técnica Colombiana de Responsabilidad Social. Colombia.
Heinkec, M. (2005). La responsabilidad social empresarial: ¿Una herramienta para el desarrollo local sostenible en Colombia? Revista Opera, (5), 55-74.
Hernández, S. R., Fernández, C. C y Baptista (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. México: Mc Graw Hill Educación.
Organización Internacional Estandarización ISO 26000. (2010). Guía de Responsabilidad social. Ginebra. www.iso.org
El Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC), (2006) Norma Técnica Sectorial Colombiana NTS-TS 002. Colombia.
El Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). (2009). Norma Técnica Sectorial Colombiana NTSH 006. Colombia.
El Heraldo. (2016). Turismo aporto 5.200 millones de dólares al PIB. Recuperado de www.elheraldo.co/economía/turismo.
Kopfmüller, J. Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Paetau, M., Banse, G., Coenen, R.,y Grunwald, A. (2001). Nachhaltige Entwicklung Integrativ Betrachtet – Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren (desarrollo sostenible visto integralmente – elementos constitutivos, normas, indicadores). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Maestre, D. y Fuenmayor, D. (2015). La responsabilidad social de las empresas hoteleras de la ciudad de Riohacha (tesis de maestría), Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Monzón, J. (2014). La economía social, germen de la responsabilidad Social Corporativa. Responsabilidad Social: una reflexión global sobre la RSE. / Coord. Por Juan José Almagro, José Antonio Garmendia Martínez, Isabel de la Torre Prados, 2010, ISBN 978-84-8322-639-1, págs. 125-134.
Organización Mundial del Turismo (OMT). (2001). Código ético mundial para el turismo. Santiago de Chile: OMT.
Organización Mundial del Turismo (OMT) (2004). Definición Sustainable Development of Tourism
Organización Mundial del Turismo (OMT). (2003). Recomendaciones a los gobiernos para el apoyo y la creación de sistemas nacionales de certificación de sostenibilidad en turismo. España: ONU.
Peña Miranda, D y Serra Cantallops, A. (2012). Responsabilidad social empresarial en el sector turístico: Estudio de caso en empresa de alojamiento de la ciudad de Santa Marta, Colombia. Estudios y perspectivas en turismo, 21(6). Recuperado de tp://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1851- 17322012000600006&lng=es&tlng=es.
Portafolio. (Julio, 2013). Responsabilidad Social en el Sector Hotelero Colombiano.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUMA) y Organización Mundial del Turismo (OMT), (2006). Por un Turismo más sostenible. Guía para responsables políticos. España
Sánchez Vázquez, R (1999). Justicia como equidad: materiales para una teoría de la justicia,-(1ª ed.).-: Madrid: Tecnos.
Soto, E., y Cárdenas, J (2007) Ética en las Organizaciones. México: Mc-Graw Hill.
Vaca, R. M. (2012). Responsabilidad social corporativa en las cadenas hoteleras españolas factores determinantes de su nivel de desarrollo y consecuencias. Huelva.
Vallaeys, F (2006). El ethos oculto de la Universidad.,-Red Universitaria de Ética y Desarrollo Social (RED), Iniciativa Interamericana de Capital Social, Ética y Desarrollo del BID. Recuperado de http://www.upch.edu.pe/rector/ durs/images/Biblio/HerramientasRSU/DiagnosticoEthosOcultoUniversitario/elethosocultodelauniversidad.pdf
World Travel and Tourism Council- WTTC (2011) “The economic contribution of travel & tourism” London.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send completed the declaration of transfer of economic rights and declaration of conflicts of interest, which will be provided by the management of the magazine. This document indicates the originality of the article, which is not published in another medium and that is not simultaneously postulated in another journal.
• The author will transfer all rights to the article to the journal Science Of Human Action.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to withdraw it until the end of the process.
• The Science Of Human Action journal will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee, in case the Committee finds the material pertinent, it will be evaluated by two anonymous referees who will determine if it is publishable. If one referee approves and the other rejects it, a third party will be appointed.
• The address of Science Of Human Action will answer within a maximum of three (3) days about the receipt of the contribution received from the author.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that are not structurally adjusted to the type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of these data.
• The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them. The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
• Once the article is submitted, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of the data corresponding to the author's note.
• This is an open access journal that does not charge authors for either the editorial process or the publication. All costs of editorial production are assumed by the Luis Amigó Catholic University.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, which are not original and unpublished.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the author discovers substantive errors that threaten the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) If a third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.
