AUDIT MATERIALITY FROM THE DOCTRINE OF THE THREE GENERA OF MATERIALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/2500-669X.2158Keywords:
materiality, audit, quantitative factors, qualitative factors.Abstract
The determination of materiality is a basic situation in the financial audit as transverse axis. The criteria under which the material is considered to be qualitative and quantitative particulars of each entity. The conception of matter depends on the context in which it is framed. Of the doctrine of the three kinds of materiality emerges as a basis the idea of matter from the ontological, present in all three genres like corporeal materiality. We conclude that audit materiality is represented in the doctrine of the three genera as actual fact, life experiences and subjective element.
Downloads
References
Bell, T., Marrs, F., Marwick, P., Solomon, I. & Thomas, H. (2002). Auditoría de organizaciones mediante una perspectiva estratégica de sistemas. Cuadernos de Contabilidad, 3(13), 27-32. Recuperado de http://cuadernosdecontabilidad.javeriana.edu.co/vol3_n_13/vol3_13_0.pdf
Brennan, N. & Gray, S. J. (2005). The impact of materiality: accounting’s best kept secret. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (Malaysia), 1(1), 1-31. Recuperado de http://web.usm.my/journal/aamjaf/vol%201/1-1.pdf
Bueno, G. (1972). Ensayos Materialistas. Madrid: Taurus Ediciones. Recuperado de http://www.fgbueno.es/gbm/gb1972em.htm
Bueno, G. (1990). Materia. España: Pentalfa. Recuperado de http://www.filosofia.org/mat/mm1990a.htm
Dohr, J. L. (1950). Materiality: what does it mean in accounting? Journal of Accountancy, 90(1), 54-56.
Fasb. (1980). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Recuperado de http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175820900526&blobheader=application%2Fpdf
Fasb. (2010). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Recuperado de http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175822892635&blobheader=application/pdf
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board [IAASB]. (2009). Norma internacional de auditoria 200. Objetivos Globales del Auditor Independiente y Realización de la Auditoría de Conformidad con las Normas Internacionales de Auditoría. Barcelona: Auditores.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) [2009]. Norma internacional de auditoria 320. Importancia Relativa o Materialidad en la Planificación y Ejecución de la Auditoría. Barcelona: Auditores.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) [2009]. Norma internacional de auditoria 450. Evaluación de las Representaciones Erróneas Identificadas durante la Auditoría. Barcelona: Auditores.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
(2013). Normas Internacionales de Auditoría y Control de Calidad. Norma internacional de auditoria 200. Objetivos Globales del Auditor Independiente y Realización de la Auditoría de Conformidad con las Normas Internacionales de Auditoría. México. Instituto Mexicano de Contadores Públicos.
International Accounting Standards Board [IASB]. (2010). Marco Conceptual para la Información Financiera. Delaware: Fundación IFRSl.
Juma´h, A. (2009). The implications of materiality concept on accounting practices and decision making. Revista Empresarial Inter Metro / Inter Metro Business Journal, 5(1),22-37 Recuperado de http://ceajournal.metro.inter.edu/spring09/jumah0501.pdf.
Montoya, J., Martínez, F. & Fernández, A. (2008). La utilización efectiva de los factores cualitativos de la materialidad: un análisis empírico para los Auditores de cuentas ejercientes en España. Revista de contabilidad, 11(1), 99-124. Recuperado de http://www.rc-sar.es/index.php?page=articulos&magazineId=36
Popa, I., Span, G. & Fulop, M. (2010). Qualitative factors of materiality a review of empirical research. Annales Universitatis Apulensis series Oeconomica, 1(12), 274-280. Recuperado de http://www.uab.ro/oeconomica/
Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC. (1999). Staff Accounting Bulletin 99: Materiality August. Recuperado de https://www.sec.gov/interps/account/sab99.htm
Shaub M.(2005). Materialism and materiality. International Journal of Accounting Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 2(4), 347-355. DOI: 10.1504/IJAAPE.2005.009591. Recuperado de http://www.researchgate.net/publication/5171489_Materialism_and_materiality
Whittington, O., Ray & Pany, K. (2005). Auditoría. Un enfoque integral (12ª. Ed.). Santafé de Bogotá: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send completed the declaration of transfer of economic rights and declaration of conflicts of interest, which will be provided by the management of the magazine. This document indicates the originality of the article, which is not published in another medium and that is not simultaneously postulated in another journal.
• The author will transfer all rights to the article to the journal Science Of Human Action.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to withdraw it until the end of the process.
• The Science Of Human Action journal will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee, in case the Committee finds the material pertinent, it will be evaluated by two anonymous referees who will determine if it is publishable. If one referee approves and the other rejects it, a third party will be appointed.
• The address of Science Of Human Action will answer within a maximum of three (3) days about the receipt of the contribution received from the author.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that are not structurally adjusted to the type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of these data.
• The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them. The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
• Once the article is submitted, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of the data corresponding to the author's note.
• This is an open access journal that does not charge authors for either the editorial process or the publication. All costs of editorial production are assumed by the Luis Amigó Catholic University.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, which are not original and unpublished.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the author discovers substantive errors that threaten the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) If a third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.