Parental permissiveness and gender differences in alcohol consumption in schoolchildren
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/24631779.3367Keywords:
Permissively, Family, Alcohol, Adolescents.Abstract
Underage drinking is a significant social and public health problem. Research shows that the family is a key instance of the risk of substance use by children and adolescents. There is evidence that the family can have a differential impact on a gender-based basis, in a context where the proportion of women consuming substances has increased, so this research
investigated about family permissiveness according to gender, in 3064 students of public schools in Bogotá D.C. Analyses showed the weight of variables relating to parental permissiveness, particularly in the onset of consumption and in favorability to drink alcohol, in both genders.
Downloads
References
Babor, T., Caetano, R., Casswell, S., Griffith, E., Giesbrecht, N., Graham, K., … Rossow, I. (2010). El alcohol: un producto de consumo no ordinario. Investigación y políticas públicas (2da edición). Washington DC.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
Becoña, E., Martínez, Ú., Calafat, A., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Juan, M., Sumnall, H., Mendes, F., & Gabrhelík, R. (2013). Parental permissiveness, control, and affect and drug use among adolescents. Psicothema, 25(3), 292–298. doi: https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.294
Cadaveira Mahía, F. (2009). Alcohol y cerebro adolescente. Adicciones, 21(1), 09-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.246
Chapman, C., Slade, T., Swift, W., Keyes, K., Tonks, Z., & Teesson, M. (2017). Evidence for Sex Convergence in Prevalence of Cannabis Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78(3), 344-352. doi: https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2017.78.344
Cottrell, S. A., Branstetter, S., Cottrell, L., Harris, C. V., Rishel, C., & Stanton, B. F. (2007). Development and Validation of a Parental Monitoring Instrument: Measuring How Parents Monitor Adolescents’ Activities and Risk Behaviors. The Family Journal, 15(4), 328-335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480707303748
De Santis, S., Bach, P., Pérez-Cervera, L., Cosa-Linan, A., Weil, G., Vollstädt-Klein, S., … Canals, S. (2019). Microstructural White Matter Alterations in Men With Alcohol Use Disorder and Rats With Excessive Alcohol Consumption During Early Abstinence. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(7), 749-758. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0318
Gobierno de Colombia. (2018). Estudio nacional de consumo de sustancias psicoactivas en población escolar. Colombia 2016. Bogotá DC.: Observatorio de Drogas de Colombia.
Higgins, K., McCann, M., McLaughlin, A., McCartan, C., & Perra, O. (2013). Investigating parental monitoring, school and family influences on adolescent alcohol use. Belfast: Institute of Child Care Research. Queen’s University Belfast.
Hummel, A., Shelton, K. H., Heron, J., Moore, L., & van den Bree, M. B. M. (2013). A systematic review of the relationships between family functioning, pubertal timing and adolescent substance use: Family, puberty and adolescent substance use. Addiction, 108(3), 487-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12055
Kotlaja, M. M., Wright, E. M., & Fagan, A. A. (2018). Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds: Risky or Protective Contexts for Youth Substance Use? Journal of Drug Issues, 48(4), 657-675. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042618788834
Li, X., Feigelman, S., & Stanton, B. (2000). Perceived parental monitoring and health risk behaviors among urban low-income African-American children and adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27(1), 43-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00077-4
Marschall-Lévesque, S., Castellanos-Ryan, N., Vitaro, F., & Séguin, J. R. (2014). Moderators of the association between peer and target adolescent substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 39(1), 48-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.025
Martínez-Ortiz, E., Sierra-Acuña, D., Jaimes-Osma, J., y Claro-Gálvez, A. (2011). Evaluación de un programa de prevención del consumo de alcohol en niños de estratos económicos bajos. Revista Vanguardia Psicológica, 2(2), 127-143.
Nielsen, D. A., Utrankar, A., Reyes, J. A., Simons, D. D., & Kosten, T. R. (2012). Epigenetics of drug abuse: Predisposition or response. Pharmacogenomics, 13(10), 1149-1160. doi: https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.12.94
Observatorio Interamericano de Drogas. (2015). Informe del uso de drogas en Las Américas, 2015. Washington DC.: CICAD/OEA.
Parsai, M., Marsiglia, F. F., & Kulis, S. (2010). Parental Monitoring, Religious Involvement and Drug Use Among Latino and Non-Latino Youth in the Southwestern United States. British Journal of Social Work, 40(1), 100-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn100
Pérez, A., Mejía, J., Reyes, M. F., y Cardozo, F. (2015). Consumo de alcohol en menores de 18 años en Colombia 2015. Bogotá DC.: Corporación Nuevos Rumbos.
Pérez, A., y Scoppetta, O. (2008). Consumo de alcohol en menores de 18 años en Colombia 2008. Bogotá DC.: Corporación Nuevos Rumbos.
Pokhrel, P., Unger, J. B., Wagner, K. D., Ritt-Olson, A., & Sussman, S. (2008). Effects of Parental Monitoring, Parent–Child Communication, and Parents’ Expectation of the Child’s Acculturation on the Substance Use Behaviors of Urban, Hispanic Adolescents. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 7(2), 200-213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640802055665
Rodríguez García, F. D., Sanchiz Ruiz, M. L., y Bisquerra Alzina, R. (2014). Consumo de alcohol en la adolescencia: Consideraciones médicas y orientaciones educativas. Salud mental, 37(3), 255-260. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-33252014000300010
Scoppetta, O. (2010). Consumo de drogas en Colombia: Características y tendencias. Bogotá DC.: Dirección Nacional de Estupefacientes.
Scoppetta, O., Pérez, A., y Lanziano, C. (2011). Perfiles asociados al consumo de alcohol de adolescentes escolarizados mediante análisis de correspondencias múltiples. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 14(1), 139-146. Recuperado de Perfiles asociados al consumo de alcohol de adolescentes escolarizados mediante análisis de correspondencias múltiples.
Shield, K. D., Parry, C., & Rehm, J. (2014). Chronic Diseases and Conditions Related to Alcohol Use. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 35(2), 155-171. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3908707/
Springer, A. E., Sharma, S., de Guardado, A. M., Nava, F. V., & Kelder, S. H. (2006). Perceived Parental Monitoring and Health Risk Behavior among Public Secondary School Students in El Salvador. The Scientific World Journal, 6, 1810-1814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.284
Squeglia, L. M., Jacobus, J., & Tapert, S. F. (2014). The effect of alcohol use on human adolescent brain structures and systems. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 125, 501-510. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62619-6.00028-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The authors are morally and legally responsible for the content of their articles, as well as respect for copyright. Therefore, these do not compromise in any way the Luis Amigó University Foundation.
The reproduction of the articles will be governed as described in http://creativecommons.org/
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send the statement of assignment of economic rights and the declaration of conflicts of interest in favor of the journal. Said document will be provided by the Editor and indicates the originality of the article, which is not published and which is not simultaneously postulated in another medium.
• The address of the journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will confirm to the author, in a maximum of three (3) days, the reception of the received contribution, if its sending is done through the electronic mail; or immediately, if it is entered through the OJS (Open Journal Systems). The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them.
• The journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee; In case the Committee finds the material relevant, it will be evaluated by anonymous arbitrators, who will determine if it is publishable.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to remove it in any part of the process.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine or the OJS.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that the author considers to modify and that are not structurally adjusted to a type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of their contact information and institutional affiliation.
• The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism and self-plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, and that the article is not original and unpublished.
• The editor will verify the relevance of the article, in accordance with the policies of the journal and supported by Turnitin's Originality Check, software that detects errors in the handling of appointments, possible copies and plagiarism. If it considers it viable, it will send the article to the arbitrators; otherwise it will report the findings to the author and discard it. The articles must have a minimum originality level of 75%.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the publisher discovers plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of data of the content and the author or substantive errors that attempt against the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) A third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.
• The opinions contained in the articles are attributable exclusively to the authors; therefore, the Institution is not responsible for what they may generate.