Identidad como fumador y riesgo percibido en adolescentes fumadores de tabaco: un modelo predictivo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/24631779.3124Keywords:
Identidad, Riesgo percibido, Adolescentes, TabacoAbstract
Este estudio descriptivo correlacional con análisis de corte multivariante tuvo como objetivo determinar si la identidad del fumador y el riesgo percibido predecían el nivel de consumo de tabaco en una muestra de 935 de los cuales 554 hombres (59.3%) y 381 mujeres (40.7%). Se utilizó el Cuestionario de Consumo de Cigarrillo (C4), el Cuestionario de Identificación con el Consumo de Cigarrillo (CICC) y el Cuestionario de Expectativas sobre el Consumo de Cigarrillo (CECC). Se realizaron análisis correlacionales bivariados y multivariados para la identidad del modelo de ecuaciones estructurales y se evaluó en el modelo las bondades de los criterios de ajuste. Los resultados indicaron que el 33.2% fumaba y que tanto el riesgo percibido como la no identificación del fumador en conjunto con otros factores predecían el 40.1% de la varianza en el modelo propuesto.
Downloads
References
American Cancer Society (2015). Cáncer facts & figures. Atalanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society Recuperado de https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2015/cancer-facts-and-figures-2015.pdf
Berg, C., Lust, K., Sanem, J., Kirch, M., Rudie, M., Ehlinger, E., Ahluwalia, J., & An, L. (2009). Smoker self-identification versus recent smoking among college students. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4), 333-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.010
Bird Y., Moraros, J., Olsen, LK., Forster-Cox, S., Staines-Orozco, H., & Buckingham, RW. (2007). Smoking practices, risk perception of smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure among 6th-grade students in Ciudad Juarez, México. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 9(2), 195-203. DOI: 10.1080/14622200601078533
Borelli, B., Hayes, R., Dunsiger, S., & Fava, J. 2010. Risk perception and smoking behavior in medically III smokers: a prospective study. Addiction, 105(6), 1100-1108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02900.x.
Campo-Arias, A., Ceballos, G. y Herazo, E. (2009). Consumo de cigarrillo en estudiantes de una ciudad de Colombia, Factores asociados por género. Revista de Salud Pública 11(4), 601-612. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rsap/v11n4/v11n4a11.pdf
Carpenter, M., Garret-Mayer, E., Vitoc, C., Cartmell, K., Biggers, S., & Alberg, A. (2009). Adolescents nondaily smokers: Favorable views of tobacco yet receptive to cessation. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 11(4), 348-355. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp023
Castellanos, P., y Londoño, C. (2017). Identidad de consumo y riesgo percibido en fumadores adolescentes universitarios. Revista de Psicología Universidad de Antioquia, 9(1) 11-30. Recuperado de http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/psicologia/article/view/327441
Comunidad Andina, (2012). II Estudio epidemiológico andino sobre consume de drogas en la población universitaria. Informe Colombia. Secretaría general de la comunidad andina, proyecto PRADICAN.
Da Silva, M y Leite, M. (2010). Consumo de tabaco y alcohol en la adolescencia. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 18(2). Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v18n2/es_17.pdf
Doran, N., Sanders, P., Bekman, N., Worley, M., Monreal, T., McGee, E., Cummins, K., & Brown, S. (2011). Mediating influences of negative affect and risk perception on the relationship between sensation seeking and adolescent cigarette smoking. Nicotine and tobacco research, 13(6), 457-465. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr025
Guo, Q., Unger, J., & Johnson, A. (2012). Do cognitive attributions for smoking predict subsequent smoking development? Addictive behaviors, 37(3), 273-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.002.
Hertel, A., & Mermelstein, R. (2012). Smoker identity and smoking escalation among adolescents. Health Psychology, 31(4), 467-475. DOI: 10.1037/a0028923.
Lee, J., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2011). What does it take to be a smoker? Adolescents characterization of different smoker types. Nicotine and tobacco research. 13(11), 1106-1113. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr169.
Levinson, A., Campo, S., Gascoigne, J., Jolly, O., Zakharyan, A., & Tran, Z. (2007). Smoking, but not smokers: Identity among college students who smoke cigarettes. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 9(8), 845-852. DOI: 10.1080/14622200701484987
Londoño, C., Rodríguez, I., y Gantiva, C. (2011). Cuestionario para la clasificación de consumidores de cigarrillo (C4) para jóvenes. Diversitas Perspectiva Psicológica, 7(2), 281-291. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67922761006
Londoño, C., y Rodríguez, I. (2007), Cuestionario de expectativas hacia el cigarrillo (CEC documento de trabajo). Universidad Católica de Colombia.
López-Barajas, D., Ortega, F., Valiente, I., y Zagalaz, M. (2010). Estudio comparativo del autoconcepto físico en adolescentes en función del género y del nivel de actividad físico-deportiva. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, (17), 38-41. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3457/345732283008.pdf
Meneses, C., Markez, I., Romo, N., Uroz, J., Rua, A., y Laespada, T. (2013). Diferencias de género en el consumo diario de tabaco e intensivo de alcohol en adolescentes latinoamericanos en tres áreas españolas (Andalucía, Madrid y País Vasco). Revista Asociación Española de Neuropsicología, 33(119), 525-535. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0211-57352013000300005
Ministerio de la Protección Social (2008). Resolución 1956 de 2008. Por la cual se adoptan medidas en relación con el consumo de productos de tabaco o cigarrillo. Bogotá: MPS; Recuperado de http://www.minproteccionsocial.gov.co/
Morales, J., Moya, M., Gaviria, E., y Cuadrado, I. (2007). Psicología Social (3ª. Ed.). Madrid: Mc Graw Hill.
Morrell, H., Song, A., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2010). Predicting adolescent perception of the risk and benefits of cigarette smoking: a longitudinal investigation. Journal of Health Psychology, 29(6), 610-617. DOI: 10.1037/a0021237.
Simantov, E., Schoen, C., & Klein, J. (2000). Health-compromising behaviors: why do adolescents smoke or drink? identifying underlying risk and protective factors. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescents Medicine. 154(10), 1025-1033. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11030855
The Tobacco Atlas, (2015). Smoking’s death toll. World Loung Foundation Y American Cancer Society, Inc. Recuperado de http://www.tobaccoatlas.org/
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2004). Consumo de cigarros agrava pobreza mundial. Recuperado de http://www.esmas.com/noticierostelevisa/internacionales/367707.html
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2013). Informe OMS sobre la epidemia mundial de tabaquismo, 2013. Ginebra, Suiza: OMS. Recuperado de https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85382/WHO_NMH_PND_13.2_spa.pdf;jsessionid=66A2C675BFB7FE880F2BB6BAD628E3AC?sequence=1
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2018). Salud de la madre, el recién nacido, del niño y del adolescente. Desarrollo en la adolescencia. Recuperado de https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/adolescence/dev/es/
Padilla Carmona, M., García Gómez, S., y Suárez Ortega, M. (2010). Diferencias de género en el autoconcepto general y académico de estudiantes de 4° de ESO. Revista de Educación, (352), 495-515. Recuperado de http://www.revistaeducacion.educacion.es/re352/re352_22.pdf
Profamilia, (2010). Encuesta Nacional del Estado de Salud de la Población – ENDS. Colombia: Profamilia. Recuperado de http://profamilia.org.co/docs/ENDS%202010.pdf
Urrutia, S., Azpillaga, I., Cos, G., y Muñoz, D. (2010). Relación entre la percepción de estado de salud con la práctica físico deportiva y la imagen corporal en adolescentes. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 10(2), 51-56. Recuperado de https://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/111271
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (2004). The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US).
Velasco Salamanca, M., Londoño Pérez, C., Forero, M. F., Páez, D., Romero, M., y Ruíz, C. (2017). Identidad de consumo, motivos y creencias en jóvenes fumadores y no fumadores colombianos. Drugs and Addictive Behavior, 2(2), 170-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21501/24631779.2439
Videra-García, A., y Reigal-Garrido, R. (2013). Autoconcepto físico, percepción de salud y satisfacción vital en una muestra de adolescentes. Anales de Psicología, 29(1), 141-147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.1.132401
Viscusi, W., & Hakes, J. (2008). Risk beliefs and smoking behavior. Economic inquiry. 6(1), 45-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00079.x
Yeh, HC., Duncan, BB., Schmidt, MI., Wang NY., & Brancati, FL. (2010). Smoking, smoking cessation and risk for type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152(1), 10-17. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The authors are morally and legally responsible for the content of their articles, as well as respect for copyright. Therefore, these do not compromise in any way the Luis Amigó University Foundation.
The reproduction of the articles will be governed as described in http://creativecommons.org/
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send the statement of assignment of economic rights and the declaration of conflicts of interest in favor of the journal. Said document will be provided by the Editor and indicates the originality of the article, which is not published and which is not simultaneously postulated in another medium.
• The address of the journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will confirm to the author, in a maximum of three (3) days, the reception of the received contribution, if its sending is done through the electronic mail; or immediately, if it is entered through the OJS (Open Journal Systems). The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them.
• The journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee; In case the Committee finds the material relevant, it will be evaluated by anonymous arbitrators, who will determine if it is publishable.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to remove it in any part of the process.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine or the OJS.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that the author considers to modify and that are not structurally adjusted to a type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of their contact information and institutional affiliation.
• The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism and self-plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, and that the article is not original and unpublished.
• The editor will verify the relevance of the article, in accordance with the policies of the journal and supported by Turnitin's Originality Check, software that detects errors in the handling of appointments, possible copies and plagiarism. If it considers it viable, it will send the article to the arbitrators; otherwise it will report the findings to the author and discard it. The articles must have a minimum originality level of 75%.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the publisher discovers plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of data of the content and the author or substantive errors that attempt against the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) A third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.
• The opinions contained in the articles are attributable exclusively to the authors; therefore, the Institution is not responsible for what they may generate.
