Comparative study of the performance of executive functions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal and frontoedial cortex in adolescents who are poly-smokers of psychoactive substances, linked to the system of criminal responsibility in parallel with adolescents who are not under this same condition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/24631779.2441Keywords:
Criminal responsibility, Executive functions, Poly- consumption of SPA, Prefrontal cortex, TeenagersAbstract
This research was conducted under a comparative quantitative methodology with a cross section study. The objective is the realization of a comparative study of the performance of the Executive Functions of the prefrontal, orbitofrontal and front medial cortex in adolescents between 14 and 18 years’ old who are poly-consumers of psychoactive substances, and linked to the criminal responsibility system in contrast with adolescents belonging to an educational institution that are not under this same condition from the Department of Quindio. They were applied a test of Executive Functions Battery and frontal lobes (BANFE 2); which allows, through the results obtained, identify that high or low schooling is not an influential factor in the executive performance. Besides, it reveals significant differences in the performance of the Executive Functions of the population with low criminal responsibility and a of Poly consumption background, finding alteration in the dorsolateral, orbitofrontal and front medial cortex in contrast to the student population that do not comply with this condition.
Downloads
References
Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724
Badgaiyan, R. D. y Posner, M. I. (1997). Time course activations in implicit and explicit recall. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4904-4913.
Blackmore, S. J. y Robbins, T. W. (2012). Decision making in the adolescent brain. Nature Neuroscience, 15(9), 1184-1191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3177
Cote-Menéndez, M., Leal-Rojas, E., Prieto-Suárez, E. y Vargas-Rojas, D. (2008). Relación entre el consumo crónico de sustancias psicoactivas y alteraciones neurocomportamentales en farmacodependientes en rehabilitación en comunidades terapéuticas (FECCOT). Bogotá-Cundinamarca, 2006-2007. Estudio descriptivo. Rev. Fac. Med., 56(4), 338-352. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rfmun/v56n4/v56n4a06.pdf
Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive functions. En Lifespan Cognition mechanisms of change. London: Oxford University press - Bialystok y Craik F. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0006
Flores, J. y Ostrosky, F. (2012). Desarrollo neuropsicológico de los lóbulos frontales y las funciones ejecutivas. México City, México: Editorial Manual Moderno.
Flores Lázaro, J.C., Ostrosky-Solís, F., y Lozano Gutiérrez, A. (2012). BANFE: Batería Neuropsicológica de Funciones Ejecutivas y Lóbulos Frontales. México, D.F.: Manual Moderno.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C. y Baptista Julio, P. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación. México City, México: Mc Graw Hill.
Landa, N., Fernández-Montalvo, J., Tirapu-Ustarroz, J., López-Goñi, J., Castillo, A. y Lorea, I. (2006). Alteraciones neuropsicológicas en alcohólicos: un estudio exploratorio. Adicciones, 18(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.355
Medina, O., Ramírez, S., Rodríguez, M. y Rubio, A. (2011). Consumo de medicamentos sin prescripción médica en población farmacodependiente de una fundación dedicada a la rehabilitación en el Quindío. Armenia, Colombia: Universidad San Buenaventura.
Organización de Naciones Unidas, ONU. (2009). Estudio nacional de consumo de sustancias psicoactivas en adolescentes en conflicto con la ley en Colombia. (2009). Recuperado de https://www.unodc.org/documents/colombia/2013/septiembre/Estudio_Consumo_Adolescentes_en_Conflicto_2009.pdf
Torrico, L., Santín, C., Villas, M., Menéndez, S. y López, M. (2002). El modelo ecológico de Bronfrenbrenner como marco teórico de la psicooncología. Recuperado de http://www.um.es/analesps/v18/v18_1/03-18_1.p
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The authors are morally and legally responsible for the content of their articles, as well as respect for copyright. Therefore, these do not compromise in any way the Luis Amigó University Foundation.
The reproduction of the articles will be governed as described in http://creativecommons.org/
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send the statement of assignment of economic rights and the declaration of conflicts of interest in favor of the journal. Said document will be provided by the Editor and indicates the originality of the article, which is not published and which is not simultaneously postulated in another medium.
• The address of the journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will confirm to the author, in a maximum of three (3) days, the reception of the received contribution, if its sending is done through the electronic mail; or immediately, if it is entered through the OJS (Open Journal Systems). The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them.
• The journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee; In case the Committee finds the material relevant, it will be evaluated by anonymous arbitrators, who will determine if it is publishable.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to remove it in any part of the process.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine or the OJS.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that the author considers to modify and that are not structurally adjusted to a type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of their contact information and institutional affiliation.
• The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism and self-plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, and that the article is not original and unpublished.
• The editor will verify the relevance of the article, in accordance with the policies of the journal and supported by Turnitin's Originality Check, software that detects errors in the handling of appointments, possible copies and plagiarism. If it considers it viable, it will send the article to the arbitrators; otherwise it will report the findings to the author and discard it. The articles must have a minimum originality level of 75%.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the publisher discovers plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of data of the content and the author or substantive errors that attempt against the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) A third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.
• The opinions contained in the articles are attributable exclusively to the authors; therefore, the Institution is not responsible for what they may generate.
