Study on drug use and bullying among primary students in Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/24631779.2056Keywords:
Alcohol, Bulling, Primary Students, Tobacco, Information and Communication Technologies. (ICT).Abstract
In this study the authors analyzed the situation of alcohol and other drug use in 4th, 5th and 6th grade students, as well as issues related to the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), intimidation and bullying in school population from four urban schools and four priority attention schools in the provinces of Alajuela, Cartago, Heredia and San José. The
survey was carried out between June and November 2013 in a sample of 537 students. The outcomes show an early onset of alcohol consumption, a significant use of ICT and the existence of situations known as cyber bullying and related problems such as bullying, which demonstrates the need for continuing efforts in the inter-agency level in order to preventing certain risk behaviors present in childhood.
Downloads
References
Arellano, N. (2008). Violencia entre pares escolares (bullying) y su abordaje a través de la mediación escolar y los sistemas de convivencia. Revista Informe de Investigaciones Educativas, 22(2), 211-230. Recuperado de: http://biblo.una.edu.ve/ojs/index.php/IIE/article/viewFile/890/855.
A World of Difference Institute (ADL). (2014). Statistics on Bullying. Recuperado de: http://www.adl.org/assets/pdf/education-outreach/Bullying-Cyberbullying-Statistics-Overview-One-Sheet.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC. (2014). The Relationship Between Bullying and Suicide: What We Know and What it Means for Schools. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Recuperado de: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/bullying-suicide-translation-final-a.pdf
Cuevas, F. y Álvarez, V. (2009). Brecha digital en la educación secundaria. El caso de los estudiantes costarricenses. San José: Programa de la Sociedad del Conocimiento y la Información.
Davis, S., y Davis, J. (2008). Crecer Sin Miedo. Estrategias positivas para controlar el acoso escolar o bullying. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma.
Education Development Center (EDC) (2014). Study Finds Most Bullying Not Reported; Reporting More Likely When Physical Harm Involved. Recuperado de: http://www.edc.org/newsroom/press_releases/study_finds_most_bullying_not_reported_reporting_more_likely_when_physical
Fernández, I. (2009). Las TICS en el ámbito educativo. Revista Virtual Educrea, 3, 1-6. Recuperado de: http://www.educrea.cl/documentacion/articulos/tics/50_las_tics_en_el_ambit o_educativo.html
Fonseca, H. (2013). Cyberlullying. La Nación Digital (en línea). Recuperado de: http://www.nacion.com/opinion/foros/emCyberbullyingem_0_1341065978.html.
Fonseca, S., Cortés, E., Chacón, W., Madrigal, S., Ortega, M., Salas, C., y Bejarano, J. (2013). Encuesta nacional sobre consumo de drogas en población de educación secundaria. San José de Costa Rica: I.A.F.A.
Fonseca, S., y Cortés, E. (2005). Aprendo a valerme por mí mismo, 2003-2005. San José: Instituto sobre Alcoholismo y Farmacodependencia.
Gálvez-Sobral, J. A. (2011). Bullying. La percepción de los futuros docentes en Guatemala. Guatemala: Dirección General de Evaluación e Investigación Educativa. Ministerio de Educación.
García de Diego, S. (2012). Comprensión del uso de las TIC por niños/as y adolescentes. Riesgos y vulnerabilidad en línea relacionados con la explotación sexual – Un estudio dirigido por jóvenes en Latinoamérica. Bangkok: ECPAT Internacional.
Gini, G. & Espelage, D. (2014). Peer Victimization, Cyberbullying, and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents. JAMA; 312(5), 545-546. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3212.
Lazarus, W., & Lipper, L. (2008). Information Technology Making a Difference in Children’s Lives: An Issue Brief for Leaders for Children. The Children´s Patnership, 4, 1-12. Recuperado de: http://www.childrenspartnership.org/storage/documents/Publications/TCP-ChildTechBrief1.pdf
Ministerio de Educación Pública (2012a). Boletín 10-12. Departamento de Análisis Estadístico. San José de Costa Rica: Departamento de Planificación.
Ministerio de Educación Pública (MEP) (2012b). Protocolo específico para el acoso, matonismo o bullying y el cyberbullying. San José: MEP/UNESCO.
Monge, R. y Hewitt, J. (2004). Tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones (TICs) y el futuro desarrollo de Costa Rica. El desafío de la exclusión. San José de Costa Rica: Academia de Centro América.
Neumann, M. (2014). An examination of touch screen tablets and emergent literacy in Australian pre-school children. Australian Journal of Education, 58(2), 109-122.
Olweus, D. (2005). A useful evaluation design, and effects of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 389-402.
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). (2003). Informe mundial sobre la violencia y la salud. Recuperado de: http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health /OVERVIEW/ AHD/adh_sheer.htm
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). (2014). Health for the world's adolescents. A second chance in the second decade. Recuperado de: www.who.int/adolescent/second-decade
Ortega, R., Calmaestra, J., & Mora, J. (2008). Cyberbullying. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8(2), 183-192.
Paredes, M. A., Lega, L. I., Cabezas, H., Ortega, M. E., Medina, Y., y Vega C. (2011). Diferencias Transculturales en la Manifestación del Bullying en Estudiantes de Escuela Secundaria. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 9(2), 761-768. Recuperado de: http://revistaumanizales.cinde.org.co/index.php/Revista-Latinoamericana/article/view/471/263
Rigby, K. (2007). Bullying in Schools: and what to do about it. Australia: ACER Press.
Román, M., y Murillo, F. J. (2011). América Latina: violencia entre estudiantes y desempeño escolar. Revista Cepal, 104, 37-54. Recuperado de: http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/3/44073/rve104romanmurillo.pdf
Shoenholz, P., Weitzenkamp, D., & Nixon, J. (2009). Cyberbullying. Recuperado de: http://ianrpubs.unl.edu/live/g1903/build/g1903.pdf
Srabsteina, J., & Leventhal, B. (2010). Prevention of bullying-related morbidity and mortality: a call for public health policies. Bull World Health Organ, 88(6), 403 doi:10.2471/BLT.10.077123.
Sunkel, O. (2012). Buenas prácticas de TIC para una educación inclusiva en América Latina. En O. Sunkel, y D. Trucco (Eds.). Las tecnologías digitales frente a los desafíos de una educación inclusiva en América Latina. Algunos casos de buenas prácticas. Santiago: Comisión Económica para la América Latina.
United Nations E-Government Survey. (2012). Government for the People. New York: United Nations. Recuperado de: http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2012-Survey/unpan048065.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The authors are morally and legally responsible for the content of their articles, as well as respect for copyright. Therefore, these do not compromise in any way the Luis Amigó University Foundation.
The reproduction of the articles will be governed as described in http://creativecommons.org/
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send the statement of assignment of economic rights and the declaration of conflicts of interest in favor of the journal. Said document will be provided by the Editor and indicates the originality of the article, which is not published and which is not simultaneously postulated in another medium.
• The address of the journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will confirm to the author, in a maximum of three (3) days, the reception of the received contribution, if its sending is done through the electronic mail; or immediately, if it is entered through the OJS (Open Journal Systems). The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them.
• The journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee; In case the Committee finds the material relevant, it will be evaluated by anonymous arbitrators, who will determine if it is publishable.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to remove it in any part of the process.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine or the OJS.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that the author considers to modify and that are not structurally adjusted to a type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of their contact information and institutional affiliation.
• The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism and self-plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, and that the article is not original and unpublished.
• The editor will verify the relevance of the article, in accordance with the policies of the journal and supported by Turnitin's Originality Check, software that detects errors in the handling of appointments, possible copies and plagiarism. If it considers it viable, it will send the article to the arbitrators; otherwise it will report the findings to the author and discard it. The articles must have a minimum originality level of 75%.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the publisher discovers plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of data of the content and the author or substantive errors that attempt against the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) A third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.
• The opinions contained in the articles are attributable exclusively to the authors; therefore, the Institution is not responsible for what they may generate.