Drug use in argentina at the end of the century and millennium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21501/24631779.1761Keywords:
Drugs, Use, Abuse, Dependency, Evasion, Symptoms, Sensations.Abstract
This article aims to put into the public debate the complexity of drug use, taking into account the socio-historical and geopolitical outlook of the phenomenon and its impact on youth, from the fieldwork undertaken in this area during the 1990´s in
Argentina. The article adopts a transdisciplinary, psycho-sociological approach, which reflects on the incidence of drug use in adolescents and young adults, distinguishing the diverse usage patterns and suggesting some interpretations of the underlying
behaviors in the use of psychoactive substances. Special emphasis is put on the need to move away from confirming drug use as being the problem of adolescents and young adults.
Downloads
References
Bartra, R. (1981). Las redes imaginarias del poder político. México: Ediciones Era.
Calligaris, C. (1987). La seducción totalitaria. Psyché 30(1989), 5-7.
Carballeda, A. J. M. (1991). La farmacodependencia en América Latina: Su abordaje desde la atención primaria de la salud. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
Cepeda Ulloa, F. (2011). Narcotráfico, financiación, política y corrupción. Bogotá: ECOE Ediciones.
De Leonardis, M. (2011). El Anti- Edipo y la transdisciplina: 7 miradas mutuas. Revista Transversales. Política, Deseo, Subjetividad, 1(1), 77-84. Recuperado de http://revistatransversales.blogspot.com.ar/.
Ed Sidranoel, O. (2011). Transdisciplina. En Revista Transversales. Política, Deseo, Subjetividad, 1(1), 144-147. Recuperado de http://revistatransversales.blogspot.com.ar/.
Freud, S. (1929). El malestar en la cultura (Tomo XXI). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Ley 23.737 (sancionada: septiembre 21 de 1989). Código Penal. Argentina.
Ley 10.067 (sancionada: junio 27 de 2012). Argentina.
Malfé, R. (1986). Pertinencia y actualidad de la noción de cultura para una psicología institucional. Revista Actualidad Psicológica, 119.
Malfé, R. (1995). Fantásmata. El vector imaginario de procesos e instituciones sociales. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Marx, K. (1975). Introducción a la crítica de la economía política. Buenos Aires: Carabelas.
Paz, G., y De Leonardis, M. (2002). Ciencia social sin Estado. La intervención en la emergencia de lo imposible. Buenos Aires: Bitácora.
Pellicier, I. (1992). Dependencia y objeto totalitario. En A. Musacchio de Zan, A. Ortiz Frágola, et al. Drogadicción (pp. 61-68). Buenos Aires: Paidós
SEDRONAR. (1995). Primera encuesta nacional sobre drogas. Lestelle, Argentina.
Volnovich, J. C. (1995). Los que viven en el margen de la sociedad civil. En E. Dabas, & D. Najmanovich. Redes. El lenguaje de los vínculos. Hacia la reconstrucción y el fortalecimiento de la sociedad civil. (pp. 357-372). Buenos Aires: Paidós
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The authors are morally and legally responsible for the content of their articles, as well as respect for copyright. Therefore, these do not compromise in any way the Luis Amigó University Foundation.
The reproduction of the articles will be governed as described in http://creativecommons.org/
PUBLICATIONS POLICY
• The author must send the statement of assignment of economic rights and the declaration of conflicts of interest in favor of the journal. Said document will be provided by the Editor and indicates the originality of the article, which is not published and which is not simultaneously postulated in another medium.
• The address of the journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will confirm to the author, in a maximum of three (3) days, the reception of the received contribution, if its sending is done through the electronic mail; or immediately, if it is entered through the OJS (Open Journal Systems). The reception of articles does not imply an obligation to publish them.
• The journal Drugs and Addictive Behavior will submit the articles received for initial evaluation by the Editorial Committee; In case the Committee finds the material relevant, it will be evaluated by anonymous arbitrators, who will determine if it is publishable.
• Once the evaluation of the article has begun, the authors agree not to remove it in any part of the process.
• Printed items will not be received. All the proponents will have to send their writings through the e-mail of the magazine or the OJS.
• Partial versions of the text will not be received, that is, those that the author considers to modify and that are not structurally adjusted to a type of article.
• Once the article is sent, it is understood that the author authorizes the publication of their contact information and institutional affiliation.
• The authors are directly responsible for the ideas, judgments and opinions expressed in the articles; in such a way that the content does not compromise the thinking of the Editorial Committee or the Institution.
ETHICS OF PUBLICATION
• The Editorial Committee, by virtue of transparency in the processes, will ensure the academic quality of the journal.
• Causes of rejection are considered: plagiarism and self-plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of content and author data, and that the article is not original and unpublished.
• The editor will verify the relevance of the article, in accordance with the policies of the journal and supported by Turnitin's Originality Check, software that detects errors in the handling of appointments, possible copies and plagiarism. If it considers it viable, it will send the article to the arbitrators; otherwise it will report the findings to the author and discard it. The articles must have a minimum originality level of 75%.
• In no case, the journal's management will require the author to cite it or publish articles with conflicts of interest.
• If once the article is published: 1) the publisher discovers plagiarism, adulteration, invention or falsification of data of the content and the author or substantive errors that attempt against the quality or scientificity, may request its removal or correction. 2) A third party detects the error, it is the obligation of the author to retract immediately and proceed to the public removal or correction.
• The opinions contained in the articles are attributable exclusively to the authors; therefore, the Institution is not responsible for what they may generate.
